2006-06-09 15:31:30 · 13 answers · asked by NO Agenda 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I' m not sure 50/50.
2006-06-09 15:34:21 · answer #1 · answered by Priscilla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know what it's like where you are, but it seems to me that nowadays, a child is far more likely to be molested by a teacher, than a member of the clergy. Pat Robertson isn't Catholic, so he's probably not gay.
2006-06-09 23:13:29 · answer #2 · answered by UCSteve 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he could be a child molester, but he could also not be a child molester. I would probably say that he is more likely a person who believes in corporeal punishment for family members.
2006-06-09 22:44:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He sure seems mentally disturbed to me. Whether or not that includes child molesting, I don't know.
2006-06-09 22:35:23 · answer #4 · answered by pollux 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would you defend child molesters their disgusting sick in the head and deserve no respect
2006-06-15 15:49:58 · answer #5 · answered by Jay-Lynn T 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i just think he is a nutjob and i think he should be banned from holding any position in government. that would really suck if he got elected to a very big government position
2006-06-09 23:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by Grims 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know could be right. I've always suspected him of being the "chicken lover" variety, if you catch my drift.
2006-06-10 01:49:28 · answer #7 · answered by korngoddess1027 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You never know.....anything is possible...appearances aren't always what they seem. (hey, look at george bush...he looks like a man...but he is only really a puppet!)
2006-06-10 05:33:08 · answer #8 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now wouldn't THAT be the scandel of the year !!!
2006-06-10 00:10:48 · answer #9 · answered by b_friskey 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. But if I were a freaking sheep I would be worried...
2006-06-09 22:37:02 · answer #10 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋