To place one section of a religious group within the same religion, over the tops of the other groups in the same religion and/or let them bully the others into submission? Or should the other groups get up off their butts and tell the dweeb-monkeys (that are rather new on the scene by the way) to either live and let live or get lost?
2006-06-09
15:29:23
·
7 answers
·
asked by
shehawke
5
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Exactly, 'notyou311', this is why the group around only since the 1800's needs to take a flying leap in my opinion.
2006-06-09
15:37:16 ·
update #1
And please no more talk of christianity being the superior and loving religion. I've seen how loving Mr. Bush and his 'righteous vs. evil' war is faring and I've read the history books regarding pogroms, spanish inquisition, expulsions and etc. against jews, the crusades against the muslims, etc. Nasty christian neighbors from all sects of christianity. For this reason my opinion will forever be that christians talk the talk, but they don't walk the walk.
No one religious group is immune to this tragedy, so no one religious group had better claim it. Not in this little pocket of answers.
Look at the mess between Islamic factions.
Look at the monopoly in Israel held by highly superstitious orthodox, the newest group.
Look at disagreements between christians as to who is really christian. The newest groups are always the worst and the most offensive.
I think I'm gonna' start the religion of "Me and my kids" and we'll practice at home.
2006-06-10
12:42:30 ·
update #2
(Bye-the-way, it will still be the one true God we're worshipping, just minus the religious organizations and their lack of agreement on the topic/personage.)
2006-06-10
12:44:29 ·
update #3
(Orthodox are the newest group of Jews, although several hundred years old, but interestingly enough have been around exactly as long as the Mormons who are also self-righteous and obnoxious amongst their leadership. This is true in any new religion.)
2006-06-10
12:47:00 ·
update #4