Honestly can you look at the world,even if you hate Bush and the war, and say that Al-Zarqawi was a nice person? It does suck that we have lost so many lives over there, but that's why they signed on the bottom line. They knew what was on the line. I am very pleased that this douche bag is dead and glad that he knew what killed him too. I'm ok with you saying Bush is a F#@kup and we all know he's a drunk and a red neck but do you honestly think the situation we are in today is entirely his fault? Have you ever thought about Clinton and his lack of action? He has got the balls of an ant, and Kerry would have done us so right? Why not just free Saddam and invite him over for dinner?
2006-06-09 14:20:26 · 6 answers · asked by llltazslleyeslloflltrullblulll 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
What can I say, I agree totally!
2006-06-09 14:22:46 · answer #1 · answered by nebkidomaha 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton's happy pants may have had a lot to do with 9/11, and probably did. It had NOTHING to do with Iraq.
The problem is not Al-Zarqawi, may he rot in hell, the problem is they have at least a thousand people eager to replace him.
Oh yeah, and if a marine wanted to put a bullet through the head of an unarmed civilian... oh, wait, Saddam had a gun in that rat hole. BLAM!
Al-Zarqawi was not a waste of oxygen, he was embodyment of Satan on earth.
Problem is, we are just buying ourselves the next embodyment.
Honestly, Zarqawi was willing to die for what he believed in. He believed in hell on earth. Bin Laden is the same.
Saddam believed in hell on earth, but was not willing to die for it. I would put Saddam on a lower rung of hell myself.
Bush Jr and Happy Pants Clinton? Hell, take your pick. I don't have respect for either of them. For different reasons.
2006-06-09 15:34:07 · answer #2 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't know ants had balls.
Now that Al-Zarqawi is burning in hell in bacon grease, things are much nicer in the world. But why do you sound so angry?
2006-06-09 14:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by eddygordo19 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al-Zafgravi and his associates and , of course their followers justifying their movement and actions sincerely as well as Bush does. From bigger perspective all participants in that trial including those who producing enormous number of opinions has balls of mentioned size.
2006-06-09 14:27:52 · answer #4 · answered by Oleg B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Was pleased to hear that he didn't die instantly; must have been many minutes of well earned agony.
I wish we'd done the same to Saddam.
Check out the Zark toon below.
2006-06-09 14:34:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"I'm ok with you saying Bush is a F#@kup and we all know he's a drunk and a red neck"
K
2006-06-09 15:24:21 · answer #6 · answered by -.- 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋