killing him by plans is not that caragious
or would they lie as usual telling that he was playing with a mass distruction weapon
2006-06-09 14:18:33 · 10 answers · asked by lola 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
never mind the spelling mistakes..give an honest opnion and dnt kill the messenger
2006-06-09 14:23:49 · update #1
with all due respect i saw these videos,also the other videos of americans unhuman behaviors in "abo ghryb"also killing many more civlians so according to ur opnions should i hate the americans and kill them all..is it allowed?
2006-06-09 14:28:30 · update #2
Yup. He was a terrorist. Unfortunately, wars are often used as an excuse to make decisions based on 'profit/loss' data, so whatever means that are available are used, and gross mistakes can be made. Zarquawi was known, his location was found out, and the ongoing destruction supposedly justified the collateral damage cost. Supposedly, this is why we have a civilian leader in charge of the military: so that they know when to stop being at war, and when to call the police to take care of a problem. This situation might have been handled by the Iraqi police, but the military probably didn't want to lose the opportunity to strike while the iron was hot. Looking back at it critically is important to knowing what to do the next time.
2006-06-09 14:30:45 · answer #1 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Suicide bombings, the violent overthrow of nations, assassinations. This is a world leader?
Oh, you get an "F" for the spelling on this paper. Write each incorrectly spelled word five times.
2006-06-09 14:22:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you failed to see all the video tapes he made of himself in "action" beheading innocent civilians who were tied up and blind-folded when he cut off their heads on camera .If he was such a nice guy why didn't you hang out with him ?
2006-06-09 14:24:33 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't consider him to be a terrorist he kinna like che givara
i mean he fight for a fair cause he didn;t go to america, its bush's army which get into iraq and simply lied about weapons of mass distruction
am sorry for those who were cought in fire but that does not change the fact that he's defending his country
2006-06-09 14:33:52 · answer #4 · answered by maia 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apparently, YOU don't think that cutting off people's heads, sending out suicide bombers and planting IEDs doesn't count as "terrorism". You must be very blind to the world around you. Damn liberals will never understand.
2006-06-09 14:20:46 · answer #5 · answered by nighthawk_842003 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's pretty clear that the man who was killed (Zarqawi) was against the US. So that makes him a terrorist, especially considering he allied himself with this al-qaeda thing...
2006-06-09 14:22:40 · answer #6 · answered by Michael 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is wrong with IED's? How is that any different than dropping bombs from miles above? He was a damn freedom fighter!
2006-06-09 14:22:18 · answer #7 · answered by czekoskwigel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, dude, get your thoughts together. Now I do not understand quite exactly what you are asking. Sorry.
2006-06-09 14:22:19 · answer #8 · answered by Section 8 rehab 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would use spell check next time
2006-06-09 14:20:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOT anymore...............
2006-06-10 08:59:37 · answer #10 · answered by deed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋