that's awesome I would practically kill 4 that deck
2006-06-09 15:47:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by sunshine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please don't get offended...this is a good deck, but you have to many strong monsters that are relying on weaker monsters, which you may not get. Not only that but also if you know anything about the official rules you would know that you are only allowed 1 change of heart and 1 monster reborn. Other that all of those things this was a very thought out deck. I rate you 6/10
2006-06-16 05:53:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by radrich 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, take out
Monster Reborn x2
Change of Heart x2
Pot of greed
witch of the black forest
and i might give it a 7/10
2006-06-16 10:22:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by racing_god2007 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your deck is the best one i ever seen. Enfortunly i have Sorcerer of Dark Magic
2006-06-13 11:52:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its way too dependant on getting specific cards.
IMO you have too many monsters that require tributes in comparasion to the monsters you can actually tribute. Tho it is in general not a bad set up... something similar to something I might use, tho not in a tournament.
2006-06-10 10:34:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
try and get dark paladin it is a card that uses buster blader and dark magacian I just can't remember wether or not it is a fusiun or just sacrofice but it's effect is for every drogon your apponent has on the field or in his graveyard it increases it's attack it seams as iff your deck is built around magacians and to kill dragons patronus92@ yahoo.com
2006-06-09 14:13:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by patronus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I WOULD GIVE IT A 9000 OUT OF 1000 PERFECT
2006-06-09 23:01:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by joshmanmone 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
sounds like a really good deck. me and my wife could beat it without breaking a sweat. would you like to take it for a test drive......holla back
2006-06-14 16:36:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's the best deck i have ever seen! all the cards that are in your deck is mine also the same!
2006-06-09 16:39:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by danz_the_sage 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
10of10
2006-06-16 02:10:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by mike h 1
·
0⤊
0⤋