English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It just started.

2006-06-09 12:44:40 · 11 answers · asked by redheaded 3 in Entertainment & Music Movies

11 answers

yeah better stick w/ Answers its way more entertaining

2006-06-09 12:50:33 · answer #1 · answered by laura468 5 · 0 1

Yes, I did manage to wade through it, and it was a waste of time.
Rent the original one, from the fifties, or sixties, much, much more interesting and great special effects too.
Same title by the way.

2006-06-09 20:11:35 · answer #2 · answered by johnb693 7 · 0 0

You are wasting your time there are many things better than this movie for instance the producers or a comedy film even somethings gotta give is better than this film.

2006-06-09 19:56:41 · answer #3 · answered by Krayden 6 · 0 0

no its a great movie way better than the book. dakota fanning is a great actress. who ever said it was a waste of time apparently does not like science fiction. it has alot of action its great!!!

2006-06-09 19:52:08 · answer #4 · answered by hazeleyedchicana 2 · 0 0

I watched in the Cinema when it was first released one weekday after work...found it good with cool special effects but it was bleak & depressing.

2006-06-09 20:16:17 · answer #5 · answered by Keira 6 · 0 0

Most definitely. The first half of the movie is pretty good, after that it's all downhill.

2006-06-09 20:11:27 · answer #6 · answered by indianalee 4 · 0 0

it's pretty spectacular special effects,but i prefer the original from the 1950's

2006-06-09 19:51:13 · answer #7 · answered by WHAT 5 · 0 0

i've heard that it is a waste of time

2006-06-09 19:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by jelly 2 · 0 0

yes

2006-06-09 19:50:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you like dakota fanning screaming her lungs out.... then no.

2006-06-09 19:58:09 · answer #10 · answered by missinformed 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers