You need to pass tests to drive a car, but any d**k can make a child.
Seems like society would be better if the only people raising kids were the people that deserve to raise kids.
2006-06-09 11:30:38 · 11 answers · asked by Kenny ♣ 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
No, of course not. Preventing people from having children is just as bad as forcing them to have them. What should, but probably won't be done: Miserable single parents (not all young single parents are miserable or immature,BTW) should come into classes and talk about how THEY NEVER THOUGHT IT WOULD HAPPEN TO THEM, and it did. They should relate every unpleasant detail, every time they had to skip shopping to take care of a colicky baby, every time their toddler threw a tantrum in the store and people stared at them like they were a bad parent, every humiliating time they had to borrow money from their parents. Every opportunity they missed and all the responsibilities they're saddled with now. The idea of being responsible for somebody for eighteen or so years would make most of them pay a little more attention, dont'cha think?
2006-06-09 11:38:44 · answer #1 · answered by Strange Design 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think everyone should be on mandatory birth control, and you need to qualify to have a child, As well voting should have to pass a test first before voting
2006-06-09 18:34:16 · answer #2 · answered by Johnson W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The whole world needs to be on birth control for 10 years. It would help alot, as the main reason people are hurting is there are to many of us.
2006-06-09 18:33:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a damn good idea to me. There are too many kids out there having kids. They don't know what they're doing, but people just look the other way and say "They need to take responsibility for their actions." What a load of crap. Everybody knows these kids can't take responsibility for crap.
2006-06-09 18:35:19 · answer #4 · answered by Whatsername 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that it still the parent choice, but as a mother of a teenage son, if they had birth control pill out their for males, he would done of been on them years ago..I am for it totally...
2006-06-09 18:32:14 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the families and the school could do some more to make this kids UNDERSTAND what are the SIDE EFFECTS of a 2 minutes sex
2006-06-09 18:36:52 · answer #6 · answered by qwq 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwwwhhhaaattt!!!
NO WAY!
And whose to say our kids would turn out better?!
That would take away our rights as parents, which would result in my giving out a few left crosses, as well as a few upper cuts too
2006-06-09 18:36:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. people should be responsible for their actions.
2006-06-09 18:32:27 · answer #8 · answered by cellie_mania 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my opinion yes
2006-06-09 18:34:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would encourage oral sex for teens rather than intercourse. save intercourse for later....
2006-06-09 18:33:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋