English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Without braking the fisical rule of matter?

2006-06-09 10:56:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

Yes, i know that but if you do it so, you would be braking the rule of matter "Matter is not created or destroyed only transformed"

2006-06-09 11:10:57 · update #1

6 answers

By the forward direction I suppose you mean that energy can be created by using up matter. A little bit of matter makes a lot of energy, as nuclear energy shows us.

The backwards direction is more difficult, and I don't think has been done by scientists. Can you create matter by bringing together a lot of energy? Theoretically you can. But, that's a lot of energy required.

As you say, matter can neither be created or destroyed, which is the old law. Now we say that matter can be transformed into energy, and energy transformed into matter. So the sum of the energy and the matter is constant in the universe. That is what the scientists say, anyway.

2006-06-09 11:21:02 · answer #1 · answered by Doctor 7 · 0 0

I know what you mean by "backwards", or inverted;
The expression is not known to Scientists just a few of my super friends... it is the Mathematical/logical description of the ENERGY UNIT :: Where Einstein's "E" represents an Voucher of Energy!:

{ 'E-unit' = '(Relative)Water Molecule' / C^2 }
Where (C^2) == 'Absolute-Numeric' (Anything beyond is perceived by the Mind as Negative)

The Equation has the Power to solve Everything (as is often now said) Including Thought Process.

The Theory is called Division or Unity / either way.

--That's a good insight, take care,

-- Desta.

2006-06-09 17:08:27 · answer #2 · answered by wise.to.Jew! 1 · 0 0

well sure, your asking more of a physics than a math question, mathematically, sure you can solve for any variable...

I dont know what you mean exactly by backwards...but if you know the energy produced, (you know c--thats the speed of light, a constant) then you could find the mass of the body no problem.

so the short answer is yes, you can do it backwards

2006-06-09 11:09:08 · answer #3 · answered by matttlocke 4 · 0 0

It doesnt matter what order you put the terms...
c (the constant for the speed of light) squared x m (mass of the object) = E (the energy involved)

2006-06-09 11:08:13 · answer #4 · answered by bigblueeyes37 2 · 0 0

Yes i is called a nuclear explosion. Mass being converted to energy.

2006-06-09 11:13:39 · answer #5 · answered by parshooter 5 · 0 0

SURE... (C)CM=e

2006-06-09 11:01:19 · answer #6 · answered by so sweet 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers