who deserved or deserves to be impeached, clinton or bush.?

Question

lets see here the true facts no bullshit.
Bill clinton was impeached for having "sex" with another woman.
oooh wow, thats really gunna ruin our country.
George Bush, insulting our constitution then says he is a conservative trying to conserve americas values. illegal wiretaps, starting a war before congresses approval, starting a war without international approval, the ongoing torture of prisoners and discrimination against them, patrioit act, lying, lying, lying, not showing any concern for the environment. Also leaving trillions of dollars of debt.

the made up watergate scandal. that is straight up bs. of course theres no republicans here now since theres nothing they can defend. i make a liberal post freaking dozens of them come flocking in and bashing me.

the made up watergate scandal. that is straight up bs. of course theres no republicans here now since theres nothing they can defend. i make a liberal post freaking dozens of them come flocking in and bashing me.

Answer 1

President Clinton was not impeached for sex it was for perjury and obstruction of justice. that is the "true facts" .

Answer 2

I don't like Bush-but Clinton did more than that. He was in more Greed related scandals than I can count-true not caught-but where there is a lot of smoke their is fire. He allowed the five major oil companies to buy the smaller ones out-(monopolies against the law)he knew why they wanted too, hes an educated man, now look at the power they have. Bush does nothing to stop it but he didn't start it. Clinton did nothing for health -his campaign-Gee is it possible that the Pharmaceuticals are helping him and Hilly with campaign money?

Pick what kind of choice is that--would you like Aids or Bad Cancer?

Answer 3

Actually, Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, obstruction of justice and abuse of power, all in the attempt to cover up his indiscretions. He had to cover them up because of his sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones. Since Clinton, with big fanfare and adoration from NOW signed a law allowing the prosecution of sexual harassment suits to show a pattern of sexual harassment (like seducing interns), he now had to lie and obstruct justice and abuse power to prevent the truth from coming out. It's the coverup that'll get you.

Bush - the wiretaps are not illegal, congress approved the use of force, the UN approved the use of force, 'torture' of prisoners is open to debate, patriot act does not violate our rights, his policies have not harmed the environment, and except for his praise of Clinton and the Democrats, he doesn't lie, and nobody has proven to me he has lied. The debt, both parties are culpable.

So much for your 'true facts' Ha!.

Now, there is more substantial evidence also that Clinton was guilty of serious campaign finance violations, including accepting money from foreign interests, as well as all the scandals swirling around the Clintons from Arkansas (with lots of people sent to prison).

No, you're going to have to actually do some work are prove your statements before you can expect anyone to take you seriously.

Answer 4

First of all, Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, not having sex. I believe there are good arguments for both he and Bush to be impeached. However I don't think it was a wise choice bringing impeachment proceedings against Clinton and it would be a colossal waste of time and money to impeach Bush. He will be gone in a little more than two years.

Answer 5

in some ways i say both as well as neither-we can all sit back and cry foul-but what would we have all done if we were wearing their shoes?as far as i am concerned the history of the presidents that we have had for the past 200+ years doesnt show many who have been immune to the pit and the pendulum---the thing that is important is that we stay on course and not lose ourselves to questions of what if---that is what will turn things about face for all of us-when you speak of the constitution in all sincerity i am certain our fore fathers are rolling in their graves--i had a relative on my moms side who was a signer of either the declaration or the constitution and i truely hold these docs close to my heart-when you speak of lying that is the game--the way politicians play it is to the wire and it is the one who lies the best and is unscathed the most that is going to win--it is sad but all too true-if you feel so much discourse towards the president you have the right to voice that at the polls that is the best way to do it-i am a strong feeling christian and it may help you to get through your feelings by praying-it is merely a suggestion--good luck to you

Answer 6

Both. Clinton DID lie under oath, though I really don't understand why lying about a fling with an intern is more important than pissing on the Constitution and signing bills with exclusion clauses for the president to not obey.

Answer 7

Bush

Answer 8

Clinton- bill and Hillary, Harry reid, Dik Durbin, Ted Kennedy,
Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Fienstein, Voinavitch,
Robert "KKK" Bryd, and the rest of the SOB's who aiding and abeting the enemies of the USA.

Answer 9

Neither---they all lie and the prisoners well there should not have been any,wiretaps --yeah like he has been the only one.they all say they are trying to conserve american values and they all leave us in debt, and they started the war ---remember 9-11?

Answer 10

I don't want George Bush to be impeached or removed from office. If that happened, then Dick Cheney would be president.


Please award best answer points to me right now, because I don't want to wait long for thr points! I'm not going to be patient about this.

Answer 11

Bush because he has killed many innocent people. Clinton cheated big deal. Many men are doing the same thing right now. No one demands they be fired from there jobs.