English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

27 answers

Yes he is the worst. And we have had some bad ones

2006-06-09 09:24:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No, in terms of economics maybe but in terms of leading the nation in a time of war he has done a great job. Especially in the face of media bias and p*ssed off democrats who have lost all control over politics. George W Bush has been a great president and has led us through some of the darkest moments for this country. Not to mention in the 2004 election if the voting was done on what people were saying Kerry would have gotten about 70% of the vote but people got a goodnight's sleep to really think what was in the nation's best interest so President Bush was reelected with close to 60% of the vote.

2006-06-10 19:58:23 · answer #2 · answered by baberuth724 2 · 0 0

Yes, policies makes contries up and down. Policies of previous US presidents before bush families were much better and US image and advancement in any sector increased day by day... But now the image of US either in muslims and other religions are now negative and below the sentiments.... US have make its peak level of satisfaction, now the time has returned US is going down and down.... just like the wish of Great Britian to invade power all over the world and the sun was always shine in the region of Great Britian.... But now the sun is shine few minutes in the Great (small) Britian.... When you see the map of earth... Great britian is shown not a country but it looks a small city.... the same turn back has come for the US... you will see US in few years the numbers of estates and possibly no region and continent in N-S america.... You will see in few years there would be only 3 continents of the world out of 5 or 6 continents.... see in future or in heaven.... everyone will return back where he was come the stage of playing earth.... !

2006-06-09 09:43:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

With the last 3 Democrat presidents being so terrible, and Carter probably the worst of the 20th century, Bush looks pretty damn good.

But you would need an objective mind filled with knowledge to make that conclusion. Must be tough to be y'all Bush-phobes.

2006-06-09 09:39:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Carter would have to be my vote. Bush is far from great but he is to Liberal for my tastes.

Regan was one of the best presidents we have had.

Lincoln was the greatest president this country has ever known. He is also one of the greatest men to have ever lived.

2006-06-09 09:31:29 · answer #5 · answered by Spectral_one 2 · 0 0

Suspect most historians in th future will rank him in the middle. Harding was pretty bad, as were Filmore, and Andrew Johnson.
I disagree with the previous poster about Reagan. He will probably rate in the top 25% in the future, based on what historians are saying now.

2006-06-09 09:27:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the funny thing is that most people always hate the current president, but the worst is and always will be Jimmy carter. he was an idiot, he gave away the panama canal. no gas. the whole thing in iran was a disaster. reagan was the best, ended the ussr period

2006-06-09 09:33:14 · answer #7 · answered by Mike 2 · 0 0

That distinction belongs to Jimmy Carter. This whole thing with the middle east is a direct result of his policies. Based on his behavior these days, I am very much of the opinion that it was done on purpose.

2006-06-09 09:25:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Like every other president, he's done good and bad.
Despite all the lies from the ignorant hateful left, he hasn't been as bad as Carter or Clinton.

2006-06-09 09:45:35 · answer #9 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0 0

george bush is pretty bad - i dont need to lists my reasons why just look at how things are going

reagan was not good, he messed up federal budget so much its not even funny...plus his reganomics was crap

fyi - lincoln was a racist - he allowed slavery if the states would come back to the union, but since they didn't he abolished slavery -- what he really wanted to do was send them them back to africa but he knew it was not feasible...however he did bring the states back together so i have to commend him for that one

2006-06-09 10:03:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers