A bad leader. Maybe lacking morals but not necessarily evil.
2006-06-09 05:35:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
5⤊
5⤋
He's both. A Bad Leader and Evil. Stupidity is the worst evil.
2006-06-09 12:35:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gonzo13 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think he is either. He has made decisions that didn't work out and people died, he will have to live with those decision for the rest of his life. but, I'm sure he hasn't doing anything that would make him evil. Lots of people don't like him, but that is just politics, learn not to hate people, it will make you a happier person in the long run.
2006-06-09 12:35:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by natex14 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe he is a great president b/c think bout it he has had so much bad stuff happen that he couldnt control and no one person would be able to handle somtin like that it is scary to think that he had to n things just continue to happen that r out of his control such as the hurricane (although people think he made it go there to kill black people which is rediculous) but i dont think any of us would have been able to handle these things n come on we just killed Zarqawi so we r getting some1 but things take time
have a great day
2006-06-09 12:37:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by buck_wonderz 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both.
As for the comment above, Clinton was a GREAT president, look at the stats. Personal life aside.
2006-06-09 12:34:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Amanda 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WHAT SENATOR JOHN GLENN SAID:
Things that make you think a little:
There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.
In the fair city of Detroit, there were 35 murders in the month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq.
When some claim that President Bush shouldn't have started this war, note the following:
a. FDR led us into World War II.
b. Germany never attacked us; Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ... An average of 112,500 per year.
c. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost. An average of 18,334 per year
d. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us
e. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost. An average of 5,800 per year
f. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us
He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
g. In the years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya , Iran, and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking.
But
It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51-day operation.
We've been looking for evidence for chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick
It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!
Our Commander-In-Chief is doing a GREAT JOB !
The Military morale is high!
The biased media hopes we are too ignorant to realize the facts.
But Wait. There's more!
JOHN GLENN (ON THE SENATE FLOOR)
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:13
Some people still don't understand why military personnel do what they do for a living.
This exchange between Senators John Glenn and Senator Howard Metzenbaum
is worth reading. Not only is it a pretty impressive impromptu speech, but it's also a good example of one man's explanation of why men and women in the armed services do what they do for a living.
This IS a typical, though sad, example of what some who have never served think of the military.
Senator Metzenbaum (speaking to Senator Glenn): "How can you run for Senate when you've never held a real job?"
Senator Glenn (D-Ohio): "I served 23 years in the United States Marine Corps. I served through two wars. I flew 149 missions. My plane was hit by anti-aircraft fire on 12 different occasions. I was in the space program. It wasn't my checkbook, Howard, it was my life on the line. It was not a nine-to-five job, where I took my tie off to take the daily cash receipts to the bank."
"I ask you to go with me… as I went the other day...to a veterans' hospital and look those men …with their mangled bodies in the eye, and tell THEM they didn't hold a job!
You go with me to the Space Program at NASA and go, as I have gone, to the widows and orphans of Ed White, Gus Grissom, and Roger Chaffee... and you look those kids in the eye and tell them that their DADS didn't hold a job.
You go with me on Memorial Day , and you stand in Arlington National Cemetery, where I have more friends buried than I'd like to remember, and you watch those waving flags
You stand there, and you think about this nation, and you tell ME that those people didn't have a job?
What about you?"
For those who don't remember … During W.W.II, Howard Metzenbaum was an attorney representing the Communist Party in the USA. Now he's a Senator!
If you can read this, thank a teacher.
If you are reading it in English thank a Veteran.
2006-06-09 12:36:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mad Jack 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither.
He's a good leader and he's trying to do good.
But you mangle words just like he does.
"inconfident" - what a hoot! You misunderestimate his strategery.
2006-06-09 12:40:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that he's a good person with good intentions who is unfortuately misguided on certain issues. I didn't vote for him in either election, but he's still our president and I wish him the best (even though I don't always agree with him).
2006-06-09 12:40:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by dsluton 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. Smoking terrorists is not tragic. And it's not evil to rejoice that we shoved a missle up Zarkawi's *ss.
2006-06-09 20:32:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by meathead76 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's not evil. I hate it when people compare him to Hitler. He is honestly trying to run this country right but we're giving him a hard time on...err..certain decisions he has made.
2006-06-09 12:35:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is evil because he cares only for power, money, and helping the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
2006-06-09 12:35:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by courage 6
·
0⤊
0⤋