English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-09 05:15:55 · 17 answers · asked by American Superman 3 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

No, but I would support a Constitutional Amendment that states, that no Bush, family, or friend of the Bush family can EVER hold public office anytime or anywhere in any state, territory or holding of the United States of America.

2006-06-09 05:27:00 · answer #1 · answered by chairman_of_the_bored_04 6 · 3 3

Absolutely, I don't agree with everything he has done but he's the 1st President in a long time that doesn't let the polls dictate his decisions. He knows and has told us all that the Islamic Jihad against AMERICA is real and his actions to fight the war on terror without regard to the criticizing media and left just proves that his intentions are for the good of this country and not for his own self.
We have been attacked and killed by Islam Jihadist 13 times since 1972, maybe more and if we appease them and ignore them it will only get worse and I don't think we want them to start blowing us up while we are grocery shopping etc. We are in WW111 and we need a good President in these times!

2006-06-09 12:28:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course I would. Voted for President George W. Bush, in 2000, and 2004.

2006-06-09 12:25:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Would you vote for Bush for the third term ??? If you could...?

Depends on other choices are? Just because you like or dislike a person or thier ideaology does not make them a good/bad Leader.

2006-06-09 12:25:15 · answer #4 · answered by lewbiv 3 · 0 0

Absolutely not! I didn't vote for him the first time when Al Gore got the popular vote---he won the people--but the Electoral College--the prehistoric albatros around our necks---stole the election in 2000.

Let's see---put Bush into office again. Why sure---I bet we could have every country in the world hating us before too long.

OH WAIT>>>>> he still has two years to accomplish that.

2006-06-09 12:22:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd vote for some of these neocons on this internet site in the basement of a house in Utah typin' away before I'd vote him.

Hi Utah!(Wherever that is)-ny guy.

2006-06-09 12:26:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You could pull my toenails out with pliers and I still wouldn't vote for him. Not in 2000, not in 2004, and no effing way in 2008.

2006-06-09 12:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0 0

Coming from someone who voted for him twice, that would be a huge negatory good buddy.

2006-06-09 12:18:41 · answer #8 · answered by heyblue_ 3 · 0 0

I guess I don't get the point of hypothetical questions that won't ever happen. What does it prove? Does it have any meaning?

2006-06-09 12:25:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What are you kidding me? I didn't want him there for the second term :-(

2006-06-09 12:19:46 · answer #10 · answered by Karen 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers