here is a web site for you. then click on the writers to see that they are legit.
http://www.annoy.com/features/doc.html?DocumentID=100722
2006-06-09 06:50:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by rap1361 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is not an agenda that was organized by the gay community.
If is a fear-based agenda organized by the religious right to spread hatred and bigotry toward people who are different than themselves.
There is no 'gay sex education' in schools, and Hillary is not a hatemonger...
2006-06-09 04:52:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spencer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gay agenda?
Yes we have an international network and a business plan.
Gay sex education is schools is part of our mission statement.
Hillary is taking notes.
I see progress and equality are still difficult concepts for some people.
2006-06-09 04:48:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"The Gay Agenda" is the belief that by allowing homosexuals to have the same rights and privelages as "normal" people, it'll open some kind of flood gate, allowing them to push their "wrong and sick" beliefs and practices on heterosexuals, allow them to molest children (since, ya know, all gays are pedophiles [/sarcasm]), etc. Pretty much, it's a BS belief of a bunch of morons whose heads are so far up their asses, they can't see straight.
As for "gay sex education", last time I checked, gay sex isn't all that different from normal sex; the only difference are the people who do it. BTW, I support sex education in schools. I was taught about sex in school as early as the 3rd grade; my mother didn't bother getting around to telling me until I was 12.
2006-06-09 04:56:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends. Some are radical,as some anti-gay are.Some just want to be left alone.No it does not involve mandatory gay sexed,but to have
comphrehensive sex ed for parents who allow it.
Hillary? She's for it(fine by me) but wont say so.
2006-06-09 04:43:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The gay agenda is a fictional agenda that supposedly binds the one million plus members and indirect supporters of the Log Cabin Republicans to the three million plus members and indirect supporters of the Stonewall Democrats. It apparently binds the men who attend "Bohemian Grove" near the Russian River in California with those who gather on Castro Street in San Francisco (I'm presuming that Richard Nixon's quote on "Bohemian Grove," which he was elite enough to be invited to attend -- though NOT elite enough to be invited to join, was correct). The gay agenda, like the Zionist agenda, the Papal agenda (in the early 60s) and the Black agenda is a product of the fevered imaginations of.... haters who happen to be straight and NEARLY always Protestant and White. (please note I'm White and Anglo-Catholic [Episcopalian], which is technically Protestant).
Mandatory gay sex education huh? Is that the latest laughably stupid buzz among the extremists? I've news for you -- straight sex education isn't mandatory, parents can opt out. Gay sex education? For God's sake man, they use bananas to demonstrate condom usage -- what are you talking about???? Oh, I know, you are actually discussing kids being trained to be respectful to one another, even when they are gay -- and not really sex education at all, aren't you? How sad, you think its good that people hurt one another -- lots of people like you leads straight to.... NO FUNCTIONAL SOCIETY ANYWHERE FOR ANYONE.
Hillary? As a New Yorker who voted for Hillary and is on the Left personally. I knew I was voting for a MODERATE TO CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT when I pulled the lever. Anyone bright enough to look at her voting record in the Senate and read her off-the-cuff speeches know that she has lived up to what I expected. She is painfully moderate on most issues and slightly Right of Center on military ones. That is what I expected. One has to remember that as a teenager Hillary was a GOLDWATER GIRL. But, oh -- you aren't ACTUALLY THINKING are you? You don't mean to have a reasoned discourse. You certainly don't want to find out that Hillary is closer to your own positions on many things than to mine; but that her media exposure assures that no primary challenge could ever succeed -- no, you just want to bash her because her husband was the most successful and efficient president since Kennedy, who was the most successful and efficient president since Roosevelt (anyone else see a pattern?) and you are afraid that she will be the next successful and efficient president (a woman in the Whitehouse, makes you shake with rage doesn't it).
How sad for you.
Regards,
Reynolds Jones
Schenectady, NY
http://www.rebuff.org
PS To Catnip, above -- Basic biology does? Really? May I recommend, before you make such sweeping statements that you a. read the book "Biological Exuberance" by Dr. Bruce Bagemihl from St. Martin's Press (if of course you have any interest in facts rather than tautologies) and that b. You explain to the class why males have pleasure centers in the anus (of which the Prostrate is only the largest) -- if they are not wired naturally to enjoy anal sex. Thank you for your consideration and your devotion, I am sure, to actually KNOWING WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT when you make statements about the sciences.
Thank you.
To Rap below -- Thank you for the link to the wonderfully sarcastic site. I love it. I'd never seen it before. It's cool. I wonder if the question author has the brains to recognize sarcasm. You are betting he will, I will bet he won't.
2006-06-09 06:19:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The gay agenda was invited by the far right to push for bible belt Republicans and there own agenda BTW I'm a Christan and its sad that my faith is a foot hold for politicians on both sides
2006-06-09 04:40:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
'Mandatory gay sex education'??? Don't be riduculous.
Having the fact that homosexual relationships exist explained to school children will do no damage - it will not 'turn' kids gay, all it will do is make gay kids understand that they're not abnormal and help non-gay kids to understand that it's ok for their friends to be gay. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT. Get over your problem with it.
2006-06-09 04:41:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by squimberley 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the gay agenda is a conservitive ploy to scare voters into voting for republicans. Religeous people are so scared of gays (gay marriage, gay rights, etc) that they will vote for candidates that promise to 'protect' us from the 'gay agenda'.
Relegious people quickly forget that theocracies are horrible (think the dark ages, taliban) and also forget how politicians often change the subject to 'gays' when they want to obscure 'real' issues.
2006-06-09 06:36:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tellit 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The "gay agenda" is to teach people that being gay isn't abnormal. Which I don't agree with but then again I'm not gay.
2006-06-09 04:41:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gay people just want the same rights as anybody else, which they deserve and are guaranteed under our constitution. They don't want mandatory gay sex education, and they don't want to "recruit" others to be gay -- they just want to be treated fairly and equally.
Hilary Clinton supports gay's right to be treated equally and fairly. That's all.
2006-06-09 04:41:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋