re :- proof of sir fermats last theorem.?

Question

in my fourth question "e" and "d"are arbitrary constants
for example 3 ^ (5) = c ^ (2) - b ^ (2)
let c = (x + e) & b =(x+d) here e and d are arbitrary constants so let e = 1 and d = 0 from here we get
3 ^ (5) = 122 ^ (2) - 121 ^ (2)
now select the different values of e and d and get different values
of 3 ^ (5) or 3 ^ (n) or to be more general a ^ (n).











e"

if want the tex click my avatar picture on left side and see my fourth question.

i have asked a question again pls refer to the fifth question of mine from top and i have proved that any given number with any given power can be expressed as difference of infinite sets of two perfect squares from this i have proved that
a ^ (n) = c ^ (n) - b ^ (n) {i.e. a ^ (n) + b ^ (n) = c ^ (n)} is not having natural solution for a,b and c when n>2

Answer 1

I've already told you that you don't have a legitimate proof. You cannot say e and d are arbitrary and then assign values to them.

Fermat's last theorem also stipulates that every variable is a positive real integer and the exponents are all greater than or equal to three.

Answer 2

do you even know what the statement of Fermat's Last Theorem is? FLT states that the Diophantine equation x^n + y^n = z^n has no nontrivial solutions for n > 2. note that the equation for n = 2 has infinitely many nontrivial solutions by virtue of the number-theoretic characterization for the Pythagorean theorem.

alas, Wiles (in 1995) proved FLT using the strange connections discovered by Frey (and subsequently refined by Serre and proved by Ribet) between solutions for the FLT equation and a particular elliptic curve which Ribet showed to be not modular. Wiles actually proved the semistable case of the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, which states that ALL elliptic curves with rational coefficients are modular. do you see the logic behind Wiles' proof?

Answer 3

Why don't you just Tex up your proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, and I'll read it. If you don't know what Tex is, than I will have to assume you don't have the mathematical knowledge to prove FLT.


Yeah, there is no Tex file or pdf or dvi, or anything on that page, only stuff that can be written in word. I'm not going to give myself a headache by trying to read that sort of math, written in that way.

Answer 4

hey i dont know wat ur speakin abt i think u only gimme the answer