2006-06-08 19:57:07 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Kissmygozilla....right they usually do not name them for someone alive but the Reagan (CVN76) was named while Ronnie was still alive. Plus another is George HW Bush (CVN77) is currently being built.
2006-06-08 21:01:13 · answer #1 · answered by ami.kawabata 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
hell no! Rumsfeld's name should be on a tugboat. Heck put Rumsfeld on a tugboat and send it to Iraq so he can fight his war. I'd name the next CVN USS NEW YORK CITY... eeek doesnt sound good. Scrap ng carrier and fix the economy of country, better yet fund businesses in lower manhattan
2006-06-08 20:02:13 · answer #2 · answered by hpgallard 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps if the war in Iraq actually turns out well. Up to this point however, I don't think it would be a good idea to name a carrier after a Secretary of Defense who has done a poor job.
2006-06-08 20:03:41 · answer #3 · answered by bsorbom 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing should be named after a man that has so bunged the America war effort and brought shame and disgrace on America. Rumsfeld should resign , now !
2006-06-08 20:56:08 · answer #4 · answered by sonny_too_much 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would go round and round and round and round and round and round and round and round and round and round and round and round
i am getting dizzy like when I listen to his answers on anything he is asked never a straight answer always going around the question.
ask him and see if he gives you a straight answer and i will settle for that .
i bet he says
there are so many good names to choose from are you sure you would want to pick just one? have we considered that we might be better of waiting to name the carrier till after we see if it floats and after we reach that point then we could begin discussion on naming the ship .but i really don't want to get in to that now because we are doing what we have always said we where gonna do in this situation and that is to stay the course we layed out in the beginning and so far we have done just that and i defey anyone to say i have said a single word that makes any sense .
2006-06-08 20:21:50 · answer #5 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they did, the crew would probably be forced to lie about where they are going and why, and it probably wouldn't travel in a straight line as to confuse the general public. "And they know that we know that they may not know what we know..." Quite frankly, I think the man is a little odd. By the way...Liberals don't want the man to die, we just don't want him as our Sec. of Defense. We don't want Bush to die either, contrary to popular belief amongst Republicans. But that's really good hate mongering.
2006-06-09 01:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should feed the poor and make sure they have a place to live and some decent Medical coverage. F___ the aircraft carrier!
2006-06-08 20:02:08 · answer #7 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, if the ship had no armor, no navigational devices, and sailed around in the desert for 3 years being shot at and bombed by IED's before it sank.
2006-06-09 05:35:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL. spacenut10100's answers rocks. Arvadaman, get the rocks out of your noggin.
2006-06-09 01:59:56 · answer #9 · answered by Well 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would be a da*N fine name. Rummy Rocks
2006-06-08 20:00:19 · answer #10 · answered by Arvadaman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋