If RH - is considered the purest blood then where did the impurities cross over? Was there another race present on the earth at the creation of Adam & Eve? God did forbid marriage and offspring with the strangers of the land that were not Adams offspring. Perhaps this could be the missing link? Perhaps the HIV is because of this? Can people with RH Negative blood contract aids or HIV?
2006-06-08 16:23:56 · 8 answers · asked by Jerry M 1 in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Other - Diseases
What I mean is could The Pure RH Negative blood somehow counter the effects of the aids virus. Is it even possible for the the virus to live in RH Negative blood? Perhaps this is an avenue for a cure of scientific value?
2006-06-08 16:32:19 · update #1
Yes I understand the problems people face with the New testament letters especially, and it will provoke argument with some however the Old testament is very similar in the early history of man across the board of most religions and their text in regard to creation of Adam Man other then evolution of man. The point here is not religious but rather the scientific value (if any exists) of Blood such as RH Negative being able to reveal in it a cure for diseases such as AIDS, Cancers Etc..?
2006-06-08 16:41:45 · update #2
Science (not I) says that there are Rhesus proteins in Human Blood such as O+ (My Blood) A+, etc.... THe RH Negative blood they don't know anything about its origin supposedly. (Adam was probably the purest of all in creation I would think? So what does all this mean? I don't know? But is it something of interest for science to look into? Does anyone know if this has been researched?
2006-06-08 16:46:12 · update #3
From what I understand? and that isn't much lol.. :-) The RH + factor is because there are antigens present in the blood which are present only because a foreign influence such as a foreign bacteria protein etc. got into the blood and antibodies were then produced by the immune system to counter the invasion. Kinda like HIV you can't test for the virus but if you have been infected there would be antigens formed to attempt to combat this infection? If this is fact? Then the RH - blood types would not have the + factor because the blood was not infected by the foreign protein or what ever the antigens responded to when introduced into the blood. Now all that said, it is said that only 10%-15% of the population of the world has RH - factor and some beleive that mankind in the early development probably had o- blood which would be a universal donors blood type. It seems if life and antigens are in the blood that the blood would hold the mysteries of scientific cures for diseases?
2006-06-14 04:09:08 · update #4
The Rhesis protein marker was first discovered in Rhesis monkeys on their red cells. That's where the name came from. It wasn't until later that they discovered the same protein cluster was present on some human blood cells.
The similarities probably stem back from before primates evolved into man. You will find many similar protiens in monkeys to those in humans, just as you will find the same mechanisms for constructing proteins from DNA in every living cell.
Believe what you will about Adam & Eve.
2006-06-08 21:47:34 · answer #1 · answered by Nikoru 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rhesus Monkey Blood
2016-10-02 11:32:24 · answer #2 · answered by atlanta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because RH being the purest blood is another "supremacy" myth/lie to disguise the fact that "anglo" people are really descendants of the ancient african albinos. Lots of freaky things were going on in ancient times. Look at how big the sex with animals industry in europe is today.
2016-03-24 05:59:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you think the RH factor is from the Rhesus monkey, this is where the error in your logic is. Stop confusing the myths of the Bible with the facts of science. The myths may be more than that, but no one really understands the references you ask about and you will never get more than a smoke screen about "God" when you approach a preacher, priest, or minister with these questions. You have to understand that the Bible you are so concerned about is not an original document. It is a collection of them and they were written by many many people and have been tampered with to fit the needs of governments and the Catholic church.
2006-06-08 16:33:56 · answer #4 · answered by quietwalker 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't know but I am Rh - as you can see I am white and not a monkey
Not all HIV Aids people are Rh _ either
But something to think about is that their was real live vampires in the 1600 and they also got a blood disorder close to aid, that make them pale faced and dark circles around their eyes and this is in the medical books...
2006-06-08 16:27:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/awnF1
I have, and it was the same reason that convinced me that god does not exist. I deployed to Afghanistan. So yes, yes I have, and not figuratively, but literally. And frankly I resent you comparing the "guilt" that you have for not being able to convince people about your religious views to the mental and moral toll that those that have borne the burden of battle have to deal with on a daily basis. Blood on your hands indeed. Shame on you and those of your ilk.
2016-04-03 04:50:27 · answer #6 · answered by Irene 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nowhere except in your head is Rh negative "the purest" blood.
2006-06-12 19:21:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
huh?
2006-06-08 16:25:43 · answer #8 · answered by Kerry S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋