survey:should new more dangerous weapons be built?

Answer 1

well each country keeps on developing newer and better weapons to oppose another, in case of conflict / war. If you want to survive, then yes.

Answer 2

Well dude, I got news for you. All weapons are dangerous. New weapons? Yes, they are making new weapons. Higher technology weapons. Ones that can hit with more precision, are more flexible in that they can be used for different purposes, and that help to ensure the safety of the users. If we dont make these weapons, someone else someday will, and that shifts the balance of power to another country. Put it this way, what do you think would happen if Iraq had Tomahawk missles, or M1A1 Abrams tanks, or Stealth bombers back in '91? Yeah, exactly, there wouldnt be any more Kuwait, or Saudi Arabia, and Saddam would have owned most of the oil on the planet.

Answer 3

Yes we need to get those damn terrorsits they can be anywhere. Thats why its imperative we develope mouse pox into a bio weapon thats 99.9% fatal.

And we know those terrorsits love their caves, so by further researching anti-matter bombs we can make explosions capable of annihilating whole countries, not just cities like a nuke. That will learn any nation that harbors terrorists.

Answer 4

Yes they may be necesary to keep our country safe in the future

Answer 5

Yes. As long as we (the US) are the only ones to have them.

Answer 6

yes, i guess. atleast more high-tech weapons so less Americam casulties, and civilain casualties sometimes