NO because if u look even to this day man still has one less rib than a women
2006-06-08 13:30:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by mitchrocks1234 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Good question,,,I always thought it might be the large piece "missing" from in between both ribs if you follow the center down from where your ribs meet..the area below that. Also..2nd option,,the original Hebrew language would be better translated to English as Adams "side" not "rib"..hope this helped.
2006-06-08 20:15:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Starchild 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone knows that Eve was prototyped then mass produced in Taiwan... Religion shouldn't be what defines your world. Creationism is a load.
2006-06-08 20:18:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cunnilinguist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It did not grow back. You see, if some guy lost his leg and it didn't grow back and after he lost it he had a kid, the kid would still have two legs. It's just a gene thing.
2006-06-08 20:30:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God made it grow back. D U H!
2006-06-08 20:13:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
God made it grow back.
2006-06-08 20:14:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by anonymous 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, and it was delicious! *smacks lips* I don't think it was a crock. I love riblets man!
2006-06-08 20:13:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Biki 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Was Adam a mutant?!? ...Which character was he?
2006-06-08 20:30:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cassor 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no you are correct on both accounts
2006-06-08 20:13:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by laura468 5
·
0⤊
0⤋