I think they've hit the nail on the head.
2006-06-08 11:52:07 · 5 answers · asked by Lucy S 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
That's interesting. Really.
I didn't look through the whole site. So government funding advertising and campaign, with no private donations or little if using a match system. It may work, but there are possible problems.
How much money
Could any candidate qualify with signatures, I'm not trying to be totally exclusive, but I also don't want any moron with a few signatures using taxpayers money to run a stupid campaign that endorses some stupid agenda, like wicans or something.
And there's an extra commission or committee every year to determine equity in the funding.
And it is kind of socialist. Just kind of, don't get mad.
I'm not trying to be negative, just thinking of pitfalls.
It is something to think about.
2006-06-08 17:40:26 · answer #1 · answered by robling_dwrdesign 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not just let the Media run free ads for all candidates in equal measure - then any money given to a candidate puts the giver and receiver in jail
2006-06-08 19:12:06 · answer #2 · answered by Dan W 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean the http://www.just6dollars.org/ you get when you click on the "I'm feeling lucky button"
Try also "hica world" and "Osama Bin Laden"
2006-06-08 18:59:30 · answer #3 · answered by cavinue 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.just6dollars.org/
2006-06-08 19:00:14 · answer #4 · answered by impeachgwb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just did............lol
2006-06-14 06:29:31 · answer #5 · answered by deed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋