Is The Evolution Theory A Depiction Of The Future?

Question

I Hereby Refer You To The Future.
When forced into a corner, evolutionists resort to the claim "Even if scientific discoveries do not confirm the theory of evolution today, such developments will take place in the future." The basic starting point here is evolutionists' admission of defeat in the scientific arena. Reading between the lines, we can translate as follows: "Yes, we defenders of the theory of evolution admit that the discoveries of modern science do not support us. For that reason, we can see no alternative but to refer the matter to the future."
Yet science does not function by such logic. A scientist does not first of all blindly devote himself to a theory, hoping that one day the evidence to prove that theory will emerge. Science examines the available evidence and draws conclusions from it. That is why scientists should accept the "design," or the fact of creation in other words, which scientific discoveries have proved.

Answer 1

In the example of the flagellum, scientists say that they have no clue how it could put itself together like that, but they will find a way. And same for cilium. And then the giraffe too to and extent. And the human blood clotting system. Or the dolphin.

If you know the right stuff, you know that it’s impossible. Darwin foresaw this. "If it could be demonstrated that any organ is so complex that it cannot have evolved, my theory would absolutely fall apart." This happened with those organs and animals I listed above.

So scientists say there will be discoveries in the future. Like Lucy then ape man? Turned out to be the fossil of a human. They say they will find a way.

There was recently a dinosaur discovered that still had 90% of soft tissue still on it. this couldn't have happened if dinosaurs died out more than 10,000 years ago. Scientists are not - get this- looking for another way for animals to decay and fossilize. That is not science. That's indoctrination.

But when they look at the things and find more, they will find more complexity, not less. When you look at a small section of a car motor, it looks complex. If you look at a little more, you see more complexity, not less.

things are too complex to have evolved, but they will still insist that they did. I’m sorry, but doggedly devoting yourself to a theory is not science. you cannot insist that alternatives not be taught in classrooms.

Evolution is not plausible.

Answer 2

Ok, first of all, science *does* function by that logic

hy·poth·e·ses
1. A tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.

Science does NOT, however, function by your logic of a theory being "defeated". Also, you should know that "reading bewteen the lines" (read: putting words in someone else's mouth) is very, very poor form in a debate.

Answer 3

Again you present false statements as true!!
(This you know is very close to propaganda). NO WERE IN ANY TEXT ABOUT EVOLUTION YOU WILL FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT IT WILL BE PROVEN IN THE FUTURE!! Let me give you the real facts!!
Evolution is a proven fact! There are more scientific evidence about Evolution and NONE about the Hebrew myth of creation!
Biological evolution, simply put, is descent with modification. This definition encompasses small-scale evolution (changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next) and large-scale evolution (the descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations).
Documentation of ancestor-descendant relationships among organisms also comes from the fields of biogeography, taxonomy, anatomy, embryology and, most recently, genetics — particularly DNA analysis.
The fossil record remains first and foremost among the databases that document changes in past life on Earth. Fossils provide the dimension of time to the study of life. Some of the most basic observations about fossils and the rock record were made long before Darwin formulated his theory of “descent with modification.” The fossil record clearly shows changes in life through almost any sequence of sedimentary rock layers. Successive rock layers contain different groups or assemblages of fossil species.
{We have now more than enough fossils to determine for sure that humans didn’t appear on this planet in the genetic form they are today!
WE HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE THAT THERE WAS AT LEAST ANOTHER SPECIES WHICH LIVED WITH US!! And I am talking about Neanderthal man who was not our ancestor but a different Human than us!!! (Did God experiment with human species?) We even have proof that at a certain point in time 3 human species shared the planet! (Homo sapiens, Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthals)}
Of course I want comment the stupid argument why all the apes didn’t evolve to humans. Ok I will comment!!
(We share a recent common ancestor with chimpanzees and gorillas; we have many anatomical, genetic, biochemical, and even behavioral similarities with these African great apes. We are less similar to the Asian apes--orangutans and gibbons--and even less similar to monkeys, because we share common ancestors with these groups in the more distant past.
! By the way why God decided to create 5 different species of primates and 280 different species of monkeys?)
As a conclusion Evolution is not a theory but a proven fact (In scientific terms, "theory" does not mean "guess" or "hunch" as it does in everyday usage. Scientific theories are explanations of natural phenomena built up logically from testable observations and hypotheses. Biological evolution is the best scientific explanation we have for the enormous range of observations about the living world.) Creation is a Hebrew Myth and unfortunately is not a fact but a myth!!!!

Answer 4

Science is self-correcting. It is a learning process of trial and error as we move from truth to greater truth. Religion is right in its own eyes. The book of the gods said so and that's right. There is nothing new to learn in religion.

Answer 5

did you know that some of the greatest minds are christian?
yes they are and were. i find that the more you look for answers (im talking really deep and not so deep searching) you will find God

Answer 6

thats the problem noone know yet because it hasn't happen yet