Does anyone else think that killing the Iraqi terrorist leader is going to cause more harm than good?

Question

The guy who follows him may be worse than the guy we wasted thousands of American lives to get.

Answer 1

What would you suggest we do don't touch the Murdering *******. Just do the same to the next Bastard that causes so much death and Misery to so many.

Answer 2

This is the animal who cut Kenneth Bigleys (British civilian contractor) head off with a butchers knife, whilst he pleaded for his life, on video.

That mans family (who were not supporters of the war by the way) now never go a day without the haunting image of their brother, son, having his head severed from his neck with a fountain of blood as shown on Al Jazeera.

He personally did three "live for TV" beheadings and sponsored the rest.

Is is a good thing this beast is dead? Damn right it is!

Al Zarquawi was a Jordanian. He was not an Iraqi or a freedom fighter, and nor are most of his Sunni followers.

Does his death mark the end of the insurgency, no of course it doesnt, but it is important as it clearly shows that Iraqis are starting to turn against the real foreign invaders and that is the bunch of criminals who are only in that devastated country to cause civil war between the Sunni and Shi'tes.

Answer 3

No...the Islamofascists already hate and want to kill anyone who isn't them, including moderate moslems. Remember Zarqawi was a foreigner in Iraq blowing up a lot of Iraqis. He hated the Shi'ites, who are the majority of Iraq's people. We are better and they are better off without him!

BTW...those lives were not wasted. These men and women were volunteers who knew what they were doing when the joined the Armed Forces. Their sacrifice was for a noble cause, even if it has not been expertly handled by those at the top. They fought to take down a brutal dictator and to liberate a people.

Answer 4

You are listening the Liberal News Media again. Their hero has just been killed and their besides themselves.

Their desire for the U.S. to lose in Irag, now have them saying his death won't make any difference. Bullhockey! The terrorist in Iraq are in turmoil right now.

Do you believe that his fellow terrorist that told the U.S. where he was going to be, are not still there to give more info. You better believe they are. They will inform on the new leader, and the next one, and the next, and next. The people eligiable to take over are scared to death. They have no idea of who finked on Z.

The America hating Liberal Media are besides themselves trying to come up with a way to encourage a new leadership to take over. They guise this in the form of news reports and commentary or group chats.

Answer 5

No, killing Zarqawi (however the hell you spell it) is definitely a good thing. There will always be some other idiot who will assume the leadership. But the trick is that with every new leader we kill, the next guy to take his place will be less charismatic, less willing to put his face out in public, less willing to take strong stands. Eventually after we kill enough of their "leaders" the group will be so spineless that it's nothing to be afraid of anymore.

Answer 6

You've got to be kidding. What do you suggest we do, just look the other way and let them exterminate Christians ie: infidels?

Answer 7

I respectfully invoke my 5th amendment rights as my answer may tend to incriminate myself

Answer 8

no. the fu**ers deseverved it. but why is this guy the most wanted terrorist? What happened to bin ladin?

Answer 9

I don;t think it matters, because the war over there is never going to stop.

Answer 10

Then kill him too.

The war wasn't just to get him.

Why do you want to give up?