Same reason most of the Bible has not made it into History Books. If any such event took place, it is not verifiable... Or, it didn't take place at all. This is much like the Noah's Ark story, where there are 4 different sites being looked at that claim to be the spot of Noah's Ark when the waters receeded. Also, Sodom and Gamorrah, there are several sites people claim are these 2 infamous cities (oddly enough, the Bible claims they would never be remembered again... yet, here we are talking about them.)
2006-06-08 09:08:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kithy 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It did. I just read about how archeologists discovered that the pillars referenced were six feet apart and would have cause the temple to collapse by unseating them.
2006-06-08 06:26:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by rocketscientist 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hey pervey pirate
i think it should have but apparently the sandwich thing was too suggestive and it had to be left out. the historians of that day had pervey imaginations.
but it is recorded in the history section of the bible. does that make god more open minded than mankind? tell it pervey pirate, tell it!
2006-06-08 05:45:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stuie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's in the greatest history book. The bible.
2006-06-08 05:18:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vincent Valentine 5
·
0⤊
0⤋