English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think doing so would eliminate about 90% of your questions? Just trying to save you some valuable time.

2006-06-08 04:35:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

No!!! bunchik is a gay bashing homophobe and shows it regularly.

bunchik
Dick Cheney is convicted of yet another hunting accident of where he shot his lesbian daughter in the face because she stomped her cute little foot and said...Daddy, I want to marry my lesbo lover and you are to pay for mah fancy wedding.

bunchik
Duh...if Monkey Boy (BUSH) ever had a REAL
women he'd have NO idea of WHAT to do...
for he prefers men himself (Jeffy Gannon has
FREE ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE...he's a professional
gay male prostitute who visits Bush ALOT....)

When will Bush come out & tell his sheeple he's gay?

How on earth did a $200/hour gay male prostitute get past post-9/11 White House security nearly every day for two years to get within spitball distance of George W. Bush?

Mr. President, did you have sex with that man? Bush has never had much of a poker face. He's easy to read... like when he was in the classroom getting the news that the World Trade Center..................

2006-06-09 08:40:33 · update #1

13 answers

Hoo boy. Flexible living document? You're talking about a document where the people and the states gave a limited amount of power to the federal government to act. The government was given strict limits, because going beyond those limits would be taking power and freedom from the people. And they have.

It has an amendment process to make it change with the times.

And we have lost much because the Supreme Court have violated their limits and created unConstitutional law our of whole cloth based on their biased views of society.

No, it is not a living document - it is a contract.

God help us from those who seek to give up their freedoms and liberties.

2006-06-08 04:51:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Trying to figure out where the anti-liberals got this idea about reading the Constitution. It seems every logical arguement by a liberal, Democrat, or Libertarian trying to reign in the fascists is somehow parroted back to them by some idiot Ann Coulter worshipper without even a hint of irony.

For the life of me, I can't figure out a single "liberal" that thinks the Constitution isn't fine just the way it is. So long as a law doesn't contradict it, I'm a-ok.

Our Founding Fathers were strict libertarians for the most part, and a few were also monarchy lovers.(some even tried to make Washington into a king, LOL). Fortunately, the would-be nobles lost on almost every point.

2006-06-08 13:01:59 · answer #2 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 0 0

Maybe we should market a copy with the words "National Enquirer" on the front. Aside from the fact that we'd make a fortune, we might actually trick some of them into reading at least the first five amendments.

2006-06-08 11:39:09 · answer #3 · answered by meathead76 6 · 0 0

I have. Want to quiz me?

I have also read the "federalist papers", which are the foundation of the Constitution, and have the Declaration of Independence committed to memory, thanks to my 6th grade public school history teacher.

I do agree, however, that there is far to many people on this forum who are ignorant of basic Constitutional principles.

One of the most important Amendments that people often forget is the 10th.

2006-06-08 11:46:49 · answer #4 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0 0

freetyme is about to learn a new word today...
(Repugs should aim to learn a new word a day
might make them think for themselves instead of
depending on Bush's Jesus Juice to tell them
what their opinions are)

Anyways Mista freetyme...
todays word for you is...

sar·cas·tic

Definition:

1. mocking: characterized by words that mean the opposite of what they seem to say & are intended to mock or deride

2.sarcastic characterized by words that mean the opposite of what they seem to say

3. A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.

So when bunchik writes....

Dick Cheney is convicted of yet another hunting accident of where he shot his lesbian daughter in the face because she stomped her cute little foot and said...Daddy, I want to marry my lesbo lover and you are to pay for mah fancy wedding.

She's being SARCASTIC...
I know its a big word to learn...
but try hard...Bush will be so proud of ya!

DRINK UP BOY...
BUSH NEEDS YOU TO STAY STUPID!

2006-06-08 20:11:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

same number as conservatives who have actually read the constitution. since brains are different they have a different response/interpretation when they see it. also tend to believe it should be a bit more adaptable to changes in the world. a living document.

2006-06-08 11:38:57 · answer #6 · answered by BonesofaTeacher 7 · 0 0

How many AMERICANS have actually read it? In its entirety? Not just memorizing the preamble for 6th grade civics class? Answer-damned few, probably yourself included.

2006-06-08 14:05:34 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0 0

Most "Liberal Democrats" have never bothered to read the constitution. That would be inconvenient for them since it it would contradict what they want it to say.

2006-06-08 11:42:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They will...once they reach the ninth grade.

2006-06-08 11:50:38 · answer #9 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0 0

Most can't even read

2006-06-08 13:27:24 · answer #10 · answered by stacypeacock1967 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers