2006-06-08 02:31:41 · 14 answers · asked by Jeff B 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
i think she is ugly and annoying, and so is michael moore
2006-06-08 02:34:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Ann is the counterpoint to Michael Moore. Both Ann and Michael believe the other side is totally wrong. I may agree with a lot of what Ann says and disagree with a lot of what Michael says but I can see the points they bring out. I just believe there is a middle position that's better because IF the extremes give in a little they might, just might agree.. How knows--Hamas might one day recognise Israel's right to exist.
To fresh princess, If Ann is ugly how would you describe Michael Moore?
2006-06-08 02:54:04 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter is a what some would call a female canine. She she always seems to take what an individual does and says that she finds criticizable and lumps it in with all liberals, while simultaneaously ignoring all of the faults for the Republican Conservatives who have been chock full of corruption and incompetence. Except for Bush. She has finally realized that he is an idiot, but thats again his thing and not a representation of the Republicans even though he is the most powerful Republican in the country. But I repect her candor and her ability to be sharply sarcastic and funny from the Republican point of view which is rare. And I frequently read her columns to hear her point of view even though I most often disagree.
2006-06-14 13:05:45 · answer #3 · answered by Chris D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann is just jelous that she doesn't have a husband that died on 9-11 and therefore cannot belong to the group of widows whose husbands did die on 9-11.
Why is she just mad at the women? What about the widowers?
2006-06-08 11:44:35 · answer #4 · answered by Lucy S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She certainly provokes the primitive in all of us and 'laughs all the way to the bank.' I don't think she really cares what she says as long as it starts an argument.
I'm not sure her process of polarizing and cathartic entertainment is helpful to her or anybody. But she's like the Howard Cosell we all loved to either cheer or despise or the obnoxious Charman toilet tissue commercial we all remember.
She seems to thrive in any screeching cat fight.
2006-06-08 06:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by wordvark 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The liberals on this site will say they hate her and the conservatives will say they like her. I think she is a bit too right even for a conservative such as myself. But I do love to watch her when she debates liberals especially when they have no real argument. The liberals will just start making personal attacks after their arguments fail such as the first person to answer your question.
2006-06-08 02:36:54 · answer #6 · answered by Thundercat 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
At times I find her a bit abrasive, but she pushes some VERY valid points and ideas.
2006-06-08 04:08:38 · answer #7 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she hits herself on the head everytime.
2006-06-08 02:36:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
love is reserved for my family but however I do admire ,respect , and even envy her ability to be so straight forward with the truth
2006-06-08 02:36:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't always agree with her but I love the way she rattles the liberals. They are like "Old Rover" They can dish it out but they can't take it.....LOL
2006-06-08 02:38:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
she's just as shrill and irritating as the far-lefties she screams about. if only partisan fighting really solved problems..
2006-06-08 02:39:56 · answer #11 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋