You obviously know nothing about evolution!!! Let me help you!
Evolution is a proven fact! There are more scientific evidence about Evolution and NONE about the Hebrew myth of creation!
Biological evolution, simply put, is descent with modification. This definition encompasses small-scale evolution (changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next) and large-scale evolution (the descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations).
Documentation of ancestor-descendant relationships among organisms also comes from the fields of biogeography, taxonomy, anatomy, embryology and, most recently, genetics — particularly DNA analysis.
The fossil record remains first and foremost among the databases that document changes in past life on Earth. Fossils provide the dimension of time to the study of life. Some of the most basic observations about fossils and the rock record were made long before Darwin formulated his theory of “descent with modification.” The fossil record clearly shows changes in life through almost any sequence of sedimentary rock layers. Successive rock layers contain different groups or assemblages of fossil species.
{We have now more than enough fossils to determine for sure that humans didn’t appear on this planet in the genetic form they are today!
WE HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE THAT THERE WAS AT LEAST ANOTHER SPECIES WHICH LIVED WITH US!! And I am talking about Neanderthal man who was not our ancestor but a different Human than us!!! (Did God experiment with human species?) We even have proof that at a certain point in time 3 human species shared the planet! (Homo sapiens, Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthals)}
Of course I want comment the stupid argument why all the apes didn’t evolve to humans. Ok I will comment!!
(We share a recent common ancestor with chimpanzees and gorillas; we have many anatomical, genetic, biochemical, and even behavioral similarities with these African great apes. We are less similar to the Asian apes--orangutans and gibbons--and even less similar to monkeys, because we share common ancestors with these groups in the more distant past.
! By the way why God decided to create 5 different species of primates and 280 different species of monkeys?)
As a conclusion Evolution is not a theory but a proven fact (In scientific terms, "theory" does not mean "guess" or "hunch" as it does in everyday usage. Scientific theories are explanations of natural phenomena built up logically from testable observations and hypotheses. Biological evolution is the best scientific explanation we have for the enormous range of observations about the living world.) Creation is a Hebrew Myth and unfortunately is not a fact but a myth!!!!
2006-06-13 07:19:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by ragzeus 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Catholic Church does not take the story of creation in the Bible literally. Catholics believe the Bible tells religious truth but not always historical fact.
The religious truth is that God created everything and declared all was good.
The Church supports science in the discovery of God's creation. At this time, the theory of evolution is the most logical scientific explanation. However tomorrow someone may come up with a better idea.
As long as we believe that God started the whole thing, both the Bible and modern science can live in harmony.
With love in Christ.
2006-06-17 17:26:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science tells us that billions of years ago it rained on a molten earth, cooling the rocks, and forming some kind of soup from which life came. So according to science, we all came from rocks. The Bible tells us that 6,000 years ago, God created all things. And He created living things to reproduce after it's own kind. Science has now found out that the building blocks of all things,DNA, is a digital code. And digital codes can't evolve, they have to be designed. And digital codes are unique. A DNA, being a digital code, can only reproduce it's own kind. Let's take a couple of numbers for an example, say a 7 & 8. There's no intrisic value in those numbers, nothing that makes an 8 larger than a 7. But people have developed this system, and we all agree to it. And being digital, we can't take a 7 and combine it with an 8 and get 7 1/2. Digital codes are unique, and they must have a designer. Getting back to DNA, it's a digital code, and therefore had to have been designed. And being unique, that's why we never have found any missing links. God made monkeys, and He made man. Man didn't evolve, and digital codes have put the final nails in Darwin's coffin.
2006-06-08 01:42:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by theo48 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, no, honey, evolution has a lot of evidence to back it up, and it certainly is a scientific theory rather than a belief system. Science is based on the verification of a theory through physical evidence and experimentation that can be reproduced. You can see evidence of evolution even over the past hundred years or so (people's pinkies getting smaller, people getting taller, change in the color of moths pre and post industrial revolution). It happens. That doesn't mean that there isn't a Creator God, you can believe in God and evolution.
2006-06-08 02:08:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Claire F 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is not a belief system, it's a scientific theory, strung together from little dots of fact - cases that could have all been individually created by some creator-god, but that might also have developed naturally through living creatures meeting and overcoming challenges. It might be utter hokum, but if it is, the worst that will happen is a bunch of folks will slap their forehead and say "Oh. We were wrong all this time." The stakes are much lower if you commit to the idea of evolution as truth than they are in a religion, when you might suffer some specific torment for all eternity if you gamble and get it wrong. Hence it's easier to "believe" in evolution.
2006-06-08 01:52:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by mdfalco71 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can anyone believe the earth is spinning and rotates around the sun?
Any fool can look around and see the earth is not spinning and is not moving at all.
Those damned scientists with their idiotic theories!!!
Everyone knows the universe is stationary, just like God created it.
Do bible thumpers ever really come to realize how foolish they appear to be?
Additional comment:
There is no credible evidence to support the claim of "creationism." Creationists defeat their own argument when they claim complexity is proof of creation and also claim the creator was not created. Only a person with a serious brain defect can assert two opposing thoughts are facts.
2006-06-08 01:18:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
if yu think about it gods science is beyond the grasp of people but even he knows things take time to mature,growing is evolution so if yu dont beleive in evolution how in the heck did yu grow?a science technickcalli is a study of something and the study of growth is evolutional science to find the order of true cause and effect,what made this happen or that to happen ?what caused the mutation is this a seperate branch,aahhh why is our child differant?is this part of our family?or did they come from a seprate pool ? those are the kind of questions that evolutional science asks,but science is only suspose to observe gods works to understand them not create un natural mutations, those stumbings will only cause a fall, but the observers stand bac and watch things happen, and some off those creations are what we now fight against so what do yu follow now the one creating enemies or the ones stoping the enemies?and btw genesis?blood?genes of dna ?the genes-is our basic pool of blood story,hints the tree of life thing
2006-06-20 03:32:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by freikeygee@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
its not a belief system, its a theory.
one that may be refuted or changed in a few years when we figure out some of the problems and holes.
evolution does not require faith. evolution does not say, believe in me or you'll be doomed.
its just there. i believe it because i think its the best explanation for now of what we've got to work with.
2006-06-08 01:14:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Aleks 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolution isn't a perception approach in any respect, this can be a approach of factors that provide an explanation for a suite of discovered info. It's actual that topic can not be created, additionally it is actual that this has not anything to do with evolution which doesn't assert that topic ever is created, and additionally it is actual that no cosmologist asserts that the universe ever didn't exist. Cosmologists are limited by means of our recognized legislation of the universe which involves the conservation legislation of mass and vigour which state that if the universe honestly is a closed approach then topic and vigour would possibly difference among each and every different however can not ever complete roughly than what's presently gift. We don't have any motive to believe the universe isn't presently and has no longer continuously been closed, so cosmologists don't have any motive to believe that the problem and vigour within the universe hasn't continuously existed in a few type or a further. The gigantic bang idea begins honestly with the whole thing within the universe adding spacetime being condensed into an particularly dense and compact factor after which whatever (potentially gravity in keeping with Loop Quantum Gravity) brought on a short lived interval of very quick spacetime growth. The relaxation follows from the physics of matters being much less compressed and as a consequence fitting much less full of life. Abiogenesis is a subject of biochemistry that suggests us that natural topic can simply be received from inorganic compounds after which is going directly to exhibit how all of this nonliving natural topic that's what makes up each and every cellphone can suffer chemical reactions, that's what existence is, to make the chemical techniques which might be cells. One inheritable fabric used to be thrown into the works evolution would start. RNA has been proven to be equipped to breed itself and not using a cellphone. Evolution is a organic reality. Not even creationists deny this, they simply pick to difference the phrases slightly. What biologists consult with as the truth of evolution creationists consult with as microevolution. It is the discovered difference in allel frequencies inside a gene pool over the years. Macroevolution (recognized to biologists as normal ancestry) is the idea of evolution that's the idea which seeks to provide an explanation for how the truth of evolution explains the discovered variety of existence on the planet via mutation of latest trends and inheritance and typical decision, sexual decision, genetic go with the flow, and so forth. Yes the idea of evolution alterations, considering scinetists respect that we are not superb, we will make errors and we do not understand the whole thing we arise with theories that have compatibility the info that we've got to be had to us, as new understanding turns into to be had the theories are adjusted to comprise the brand new understanding, if that new understanding does not simply falsify the idea. Evolution has certainly not been falsified by means of any new understanding however new understanding has precipitated us to regulate the way in which we view the procedure. This is a further gigantic motive why evolution isn't a perception approach. Belief techniques require that nobody query the founded dogma, at the same time the idea of evolution is continuously being wondered, new understanding is continuously being found out and the main points are continuously being adjusted to do not forget this new understanding. Belief techniques reject any understanding that conflicts with the founded approach. Evolution accepts understanding even though it conflicts if it may be supported by means of proof. And again to the gigantic bang, sure, in keeping with cosmology the whole thing that's right here now used to be right here earlier than the gigantic bang. The gigantic bang isn't asserted to be the commencing of the universe, simply the commencing of the universe as it's presently configured. No scientists don't seem to be telling us that some thing for which we all know of no typical procedure that does not require human intervention will ever occur on its possess with out human intervention, best that chemical techniques which we realize going down always and don't have any motive to count on that some thing wise is intervening will occur on their possess and we don't have any motive to count on some thing wise intervenes. Everything that occurs in each and every cellphone is a chemical procedure. Evolution is pushed by means of chemical techniques. Abiogenesis could had been pushed by means of chemical techniques. The fact is that those techniques don't seem to be random. Mutations could also be random however typical decision isn't random.
2016-09-08 22:09:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by delsignore 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is just another myth dreamed up by primitive Atheists to explain his surroundings, and hope that there is no afterlife. if there is an afterlife, they are in deep trouble so its easier to justify their existence by saying there is no God; the universe created itself from two big rocks that met, fell in love, got into a violent fight and smacked each other to pieces, these pieces became planets and gaseous anomalies and so on.
They can't fathom a God who's technology is beyond man's most brilliant minds. They can't create universes, or life of their own so they reason that no being could exist who could do what they can not.
2006-06-08 02:17:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Victor ious 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Catholic Christian and I believe that God created everything perfectly, according to His plan. Now it is possible that He did create through the process of evolution, that does not conflict with belief that God IS THE CREATOR OF ALL.
2006-06-08 02:02:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋