I just have one question for you, when a leader,lets say a leader of the highest rank dies, does the organization fall apart, because of one man? No organization worth its weight in salt is dependent on just a few key personnel. Someone would simply step in to assume command. This is true for all organizations, military, or otherwise.If BinLaden is killed, someone would just replace him.
2006-06-07 23:51:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by WC 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Zarqawi's death may be more symbolic than anything else. At best we can hope for is a temporary disruption in organization and leadership, and that may be enough to mark the beginning of a downhill slide in terrorist morale. The hard fact remains that it does not take much leadership to pack a car full of explosive and drive it into a crowded restaurant or shopping area with intent to kill as many people as possible. These kind of terrorists are social deviates, and they got that way because of a narrow world view developed from excessive, irrational, and pejudiced "study" of the Qur'an. When people use religion as a justification for mass killing of innocent people you don't have to be a genius to see what the problem is.
There are others like Zarqawi out there willing to jump in and fill the void. And the only solution is to kill them all. You cannot negotiate with these people, so the only way to solve the problem is to kill them. The more that can be killed the better, and I would go so far as to say that if 100 innocent people had to be killed to get one confirmed terrorist the price is not too high. Life is cheap in Islam, so if hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of innocent lives have to be lost to wipe out the terrorists then it is worth it.
It is interesting to note that come of the credit for the death of Zarqawi seem to be going to tips from the locals, and this is good because it signals a willingness of common people to join in the cause to rid the earth of these scum. It must get wearisome after a while to see everyone around you being killed, even for a Muslim.
2006-06-08 07:13:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kokopelli 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The way the Americans screwed up that country it will take decades if ever to end the war. Someone else will take Al Zarqawi's place that is sure.
As long there are agressors in Iraq there will beople resisting them.
2006-06-08 06:51:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kimon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Zarqawi and salami on day old wheat bread. Today there will be more bloodshed in Iraq just like yesterday and the day before.
2006-06-08 06:48:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by will 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I gotta say ...I don't know all the particulars but oil plays a great part in all of this. The price per barrel drop when his death was announced. the guy in charged of the energy ministry in Iraq made a moment about continuing to safe guard the oil. It's their "trump card".
2006-06-08 07:00:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by mjohn28497@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush will simply find himself an excuse to remain in Iraq for the oil.
2006-06-08 06:47:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Trapz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Watch the news, those people are crazy! His death isn't going to single the end of anything. Someone else will step up and take his gun and start shooting! Everyone is replaceable.
2006-06-08 06:49:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by beekiss 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
blood spill trigger adrenalin.Perhaps what happened to Christianity may happen again!! I think if we played better, more people would have been with us in this was against terror.[More Muslims..]
Bush acted like a boy who just discovered his device!! :)
2006-06-08 06:51:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by fen 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Usame Ben Ladin has many guys to send Iraq, be sure as many as you cant guess.
2006-06-08 06:47:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by sesamos 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possibly, but we need to finish this fight. WE WILL win this war. Way to go troops!
He may be replaced, but yet his replacement can still be killed
2006-06-08 06:53:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by .45 Peacemaker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋