2006-06-07 14:52:02 · 9 answers · asked by sticky 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
it doesnt
ive studied this now many years in my free time,
the two are incompatable
genesis says god made man out of clay
evolution says that man evolved from a common ancestor with the great ape
this isn't to say god started all this, which many believe, just that it is not the same as the genesis account
lots of what i base this on is conversations with 100s of people, and dozens of books
2006-06-07 14:57:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Adam and Eve can only be understood as a metaphor. Adam "ate from the tree of knowledge": That is an analogy to having sexual relations (knowledge in the bible often refers to carnal knowledge) The "snake" is another clue here folks as in the phallus and animalistic desire. When Adam had sexual knowledge it severed his connection with the divine and mankind was cast out of Eden/to have union with God.
Now evolution is scientific fact- it comes from centuries of well documented research. It is comparing apples to oranges. Spiritual evolution versus the evolution of the Earth.
2006-06-07 22:23:16 · answer #2 · answered by dwight B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no connection.
Several years ago (around 1996), I read an article from a Canadian newspaper in which a Russian scientist says that he had figured out what it was that triggered life in the ooz.
His theory is that as aliens were passing by earth, they emptied their waste tanks on the earth. (I kept the article, but have misplaced it.) The conclusion, for those who chose to believe the evolution theory, is that your great,great, great ancestors were space turds.
I think that evolution is a load of crap.
2006-06-07 22:07:54 · answer #3 · answered by Marty 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all Adam and Eve is only one idea. Evolution seems more viable. Adam and Eve seems like a fairytale.
2006-06-07 21:59:57 · answer #4 · answered by bea1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't and if you research it you'll find the technology we have today (far more advanced than what was available to Darwin) has shown that it may have been a viable theory in the 19th century, but not in the 21st century. Check out answersInGenesis.org and equip.org for some great resources and you'll be able to see why evolution is simply a theory (and one where there have been many proven false "finds") God bless you!
2006-06-07 22:03:45 · answer #5 · answered by newfsdrool 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is false when's the last time you seen an ape have a human baby? When the last time you seen animals build a house like man can? Never!
2006-06-07 22:03:35 · answer #6 · answered by **Anti-PeTA** 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it could be like Adam and Eve were the first humans to evolve from the common ancestor that humans and apes r related to. Apparently we're 97% chimpanzee. I dunno if does though coz Adam was made out of clay and Eve was made from one of Adams Ribs.
2006-06-07 22:10:57 · answer #7 · answered by xoɟ ʍous 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
let me see, mmmm.. maybe Adam and eve are the product of thousand of years of evolution, I think thats all
2006-06-07 21:57:28 · answer #8 · answered by luiskarlos 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't.
2006-06-07 21:56:16 · answer #9 · answered by southfloridamullets 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋