It was said that Osama is responsible for 9/11 that claims the lives of over four thousand. Yes we know that. But Osama denied to be the person who mastermind that attack, although it was not accepted at all.
In the real facts, Bush and Blair should be held responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands people in Palestine, Afganistan, and Iraq. Over two hundred thousand lives were lost and are still being lost. Bush said he want to free the people of those countries, but what kind of freedom is this? What is freedom for the dead person. If those people were allowed to continue their lives as usual, it could be better for them. But now they are being killed and saying that they are being freed.
Nobody ever hope to have this kind of freedom. It is not freedom, it is GENOCIDE.
Can you specify the terrorist between the one who killed four thousand and one that killed hundreds of thousands. Who is a real terrorist among these people.
2006-06-07 07:18:27 · 13 answers · asked by muzyne 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Bush has killed far more innocent people than Osama. This is a documented fact. Bush is a far worse terrorist, but that doesn't exonerate Osama either. But they actually need eachother as villains to justify their own violent acts.
2006-06-07 07:21:55 · answer #1 · answered by lip11 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
when you say 200,000 killed by bush are you saying innocent civilians that were killed by US and UK military? Because that is false. You should be using the correct numbers of Iraqi militants killed by US and UK military and the innocent cilvilians mailnly cut down by the terrorist now working in Iraq claimed to be under control of Osama ..and btw Osama did take credit in being the mastermind of 9/11 and he also said a few weeks ago that he did not OK Zaquarias Mousoui (er whoever)as one of the hijackers for 9/11. That kinda puts him in a mastermind decision making pulpit doesnt it?
answer...Osama
2006-06-07 14:32:18 · answer #2 · answered by daniel m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One of the most brutal,evil men on the planet is gone: namely alZarqawi. Those who are free to make ill informed , slanderous statements about the president of a country who works to keep that right alive- are a curious breed indeed . Anyone of them could not dare to speak such words in parts of the Middle East & beyond without their severed head being placed on their doorstep-as is many today of wives , sisters & mothers are over there .
To even suggest President George W. Bush is a terrorist is as laughable as it is baffling -in light of the worst terrorist act on our shores happening on his watch. And this after Bill Clinton severely weakend our military .You have to scratch your head in wonder & amazement at those who shuddered as aircraft & buildings fell on 9/11, only to hear those same people turn around and blame the very man who has prevented another terrorist attack on our shores ; and is keeping the terrorists on the run !
Those who put their faith in the liberal kooks who betray their own country JUST TO PLAY POLITICS , are sadly playing into the hands of those who give aid & comfort to the very people who would behead them if given half the chance ; and to those who trash our heroes , our United States Military. Under the watch of George W.Bush , we here in the United States can rest easy . While there are those who THINK our President is killing our brave men & women in Iraq-President Bush didn't force troops to volunteer. Under the watch of George W. Bush , hundreds of thousands in Sadams mass graves were uncovered , and hundreds of thousands more deaths have been prevented with the removal of Saddam & sons from power.If those who blindly place blame on the very man who set forth programs to protect and defend our nation after the worst terrorist attack on our shores-would only look up the facts for themselves-there wouldn't be so much hate being parroted by the radical left drive-by media and the "would be" communist party who can't win elections now that they are being exposed as traitors .
2006-06-08 13:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both...
But maybe Bush the terrorist that got lisence
But Osama terrorist that havent lisence
2006-06-07 14:23:02 · answer #4 · answered by lazuardi.sepi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well they're both scarily stupid and a bit too powerful for my liking.
Any minute now this will be inundated with angry Bushites. Just you watch.
2006-06-07 14:27:43 · answer #5 · answered by Moggy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is freedom fighter (hehehe)
2006-06-07 15:19:17 · answer #6 · answered by nunjogomez17 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
freedom dosnt matter when bush kills everybody in the country
2006-06-07 17:05:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be like comparing the colors violet and purple.
2006-06-07 14:27:09 · answer #8 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama and all of you american-bashing moonbats.
2006-06-07 14:40:43 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Easy answer... bin Laden
2006-06-07 14:21:57 · answer #10 · answered by Jersey Girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋