English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-07 06:46:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Or do you think native Africans and Australians have more melanin by coincidence?

2006-06-07 06:47:14 · update #1

I'm just saying, even if you believe in the Bible, and especially if you do in light of Noah and different colored people now, you must believe in evolution.

2006-06-07 07:20:34 · update #2

I'm just saying, even if you believe in the Bible, and especially if you do in light of Noah and different colored people now, you must believe in evolution.

2006-06-07 07:20:39 · update #3

13 answers

There are hundreds of evolutionary biologist who have charts and data proving evolution beyond the "We all look different" theory.

2006-06-07 06:50:48 · answer #1 · answered by The Teacher 6 · 0 0

I think the question is out of text but I will answer with a question, what makes you think that Noah's daughters in law were white and visa-versa.Could Noah's son be white and marries to a different color?Who is to say everyone on board was the same color?
Even with that,- could it not be possible for the God who made the heavens and the Earth, who created birds to fly and fish to swim, decide when where and why different races should begin?
God Bless
Grandma

2006-06-07 14:09:38 · answer #2 · answered by grandma 4 · 0 0

We did evolve from Noah's family. The first humans have already been proven to be black, so I'm guessing Noah and his familiy were black. Some of their descendants went to the cold regions, where they lost some of that skin, hair and eye color they didn't need, hence the blonde haired, blue eyed Swedes, etc.. Notice that the warmer the climate, the darker the skin of the native people of that region? Seems perfectly reasonable to me to that Noah's family and evoloution go hand in hand.

2006-06-07 14:27:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is not evolution in action, genetics show that there are never any positive net in genetic information - in other words, there is never a gain in genetic information but a loss or resorting of genetic information. A winged beetle would live well on a mainland, but if it was to get blown out to an island and start a colony there, if the beetles begin to produce the wingless variety (LOSS of information), the wingless variety would dominate the island.

Apply this to humans.

2006-06-07 14:00:01 · answer #4 · answered by Soga 4 · 0 0

Christians don't have a problem with microevolution but macroevolution is totally false. For example, everybody is still human even if they are Asian, White, Black, Hispanic, etc. Variation has happened but they are still human. This is microevolution. It's the idea that an amoeba turned ito a fish, turned ito a monkey, turned into a human. This is macroeviolution and is what most christians belive to be false

2006-06-07 15:23:33 · answer #5 · answered by jk82672 2 · 0 0

Don't try to do science based on the bible. The bible is nothing but lies, front to back. Everything in it has been proven to be false (universe is way older than 7000 years, the sun didn't stop for a day, fossils show that "creation took more than 7 days, etc).

2006-06-07 13:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by Electro-Fogey 6 · 0 0

Noah was just a story, it has nothing to do with real life. People evolved for many years in different climates/areas, and that explains the different looks of people.

2006-06-07 13:50:11 · answer #7 · answered by Karen_momof4 3 · 0 0

Well, if you want to go all biblical, Noah's kids were all apparently VERY different from each other.

But really, I think that the races adapted to where they were living.

2006-06-07 13:51:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually if evolution were true, we would all look more alike. Looking different proves we were all created uniquely

2006-06-07 13:57:55 · answer #9 · answered by impossble_dream 6 · 0 0

uh...no.

and to the first responder. there is a huge amount of evidence for evolution, even corroberating evidence that connects different academies of science.

what there is no evidence of is the existence of god.

2006-06-07 13:52:23 · answer #10 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers