Well, I'd say that I didn't learn allot directly from the book. Most of the stuff that I learned about him were from the countless documentaries that saturated the education channels during the controversy of the Da Vinci Code. I learned that he was an outcast due to the fact that his parents were from two classes of society and therefore forbidden to marry. I learned that although the church contracted him to paint many paintings he never quite gave them exactly what they wanted, and he was asked to repaint at least one of his paintings. He was brilliant. Much more intelligent than I ever thought. He was truly a Renascence man.
2006-06-07 00:27:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Ha ha, thomas, you're getting your books mixed up, the Illuminati had no role in Da Vinci Code, that was Angels and Demons.
To answer the question, nothing.
2006-06-07 07:03:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by desiderio 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
That he'd belong to a Priority of Sian
2006-06-07 07:06:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Atomin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't learn anything; I'm not believing anything in the book/movie since most of it is fake, I'm not sure what can even possibly be true.
2006-06-07 07:01:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Shauna 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the davinci code is a load of junk
2006-06-07 07:48:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many people feel the need to mangle his greatest works to fuel saft conspiracy theories...a great man, but no illuminati
Edit ' woops, my mistake, thanks poster *looks ashamed*..well, he still wasnt in a secret society...lol
2006-06-07 06:56:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by thomas p 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
didn't know he put so many double-meanings into his paintings and that most of his paintings were rejected by the church and he had to redo them.
2006-06-07 07:02:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by F R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
he's homosexual
2006-06-07 06:58:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋