I don't think there is any such thing as marginalizing religions. They are all different and would have been very difficult trying to bring them together.
2006-06-06 23:39:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Murphy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The most current ones:
The fight over gay marriage.
The war in Iraq.
Many people sailed for the new world to escape religious persecutions. They established colonies which for the most part had a dominant denomination.
Later, other people fought and/or died in the American revolution and paid for my freedoms. The vast majority of these were also deeply religious.
So all these same religious people would be kicked to the curb today so that a new generation of "separation of church and state" people would rise to the occasion and sacrifice their fortunes, their reputations and their lives for my freedoms. NOT!
Margining religion, and religious peoples, means that we stake the continuation of our civil institutions on secular people. Good Luck. Maybe Ossy Osborne can be the next George Washington.
In the next crisis, maybe Puff Daddy can get out the bling bling and organize the militia at Concord. Ya, right.
2006-06-21 00:57:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by ericasqeeze 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The point is our understanding of "religion" has become flawed. Religion today has become only a way to earn power and money.
If religion means it is a path to go towards God, how come in history the most bloodshed has happened in the name of religion? Is it possible that one God created a Christian and another a Muslim?
IF there is a God or creator there can only be one God or creator because there is only one creation. All religions probably started (with enlightened beings- Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha etc) with a view to help people reach closer to the creator but overtime have become a means to earn money, power and fame.
I know my answer does not directly answer your question- But I feel so strongly about this that I could not help writing the above.
2006-06-21 03:53:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Siddarth G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering the religions that have been marginalized, I would say that our society is more tolerant, free-thinking, more pleasant, and more economically sound. Can you imagine how slowly the economy would grow if we were all Puritanical and disdained pleasure? Heck, the Puritans were accepting of executing 'heretics', people who had a different faith. In our multi-cultural society, religions that are intolerant have to sit in the back seat. Hopefully newer expressions of spirituality that are affirming of the tolerant and loving view-point will grow in popularity and become a mainstay in American culture.
2006-06-07 05:10:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without a doubt, I believe your question has validity. But with that said, it will be necessary to check into my archives of linguist thoughts on this particular subject matter, to ascertain as to the best and most beneficial response scheme possible. Although the question has some important thoughts and validity, I would advise you to seek a professional who can best serve you, since most of the people, who answer questions are good at cutting and pasting, spreading descent, and peddling gloom. Although I will do my best to be forthright in giving you the best answer possible, I am afraid anything that I write would be taken entirely out of context. For this reason, and this reason alone, I will say there are always good answers; but rarely are there perfect answers. So my answer can not and will not serve your needs for anything medical or evangelical. I will only answer by saying this is my best sentiment for which I have actually put my best foot forward to be able to reach a solution to your question that is embedded with perplexing thoughts; it in no way reflects my moral values or any opinion of my business, that will remain incognito.
2006-06-19 11:26:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last time that religion made the laws of society it was called the Dark Ages
2006-06-16 22:01:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ed M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Secularism means all people get to have freedom of religion or freedom from religion, it is the only fair kind of government, an official religion disadvantages everybody who is not of that sanctioned religion and privileges all who are, it causes jealousy & division in society.
Secularism means we keep our religious symbols in their proper places, that's the home & places of worship or other private spaces, secularism doesn't mean religion is banned it's quite the opposite, it means we are all free to follow whatever religion we want to or none whilst remaining within the laws of the land.
2006-06-07 05:18:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Naturally. Religion is somewhat of a sophisticated hobby a person, religious or not, has to pay for thus living in a country of majority of believers.
2006-06-21 04:07:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pwerunicca 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing but good can come from marginalizing religion.
2006-06-16 23:40:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see nothing good, since the only purpose religion serves is to divide people. To be spiritual and gain enlightenment is the only true way to gain understanding, openmindedness, and willingness.
2006-06-19 07:06:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by tropicvibe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋