2006-06-06 19:55:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
yeah i'm kinda with her opinion, 0 isn't a significant digit therefore the only other possible time period in which the birth of the anti-christ could've been(assuming it was 666) would be
june 6, 6 A.D.
or
june 6, 6 B.C.
2006-06-06 20:09:46 · answer #1 · answered by barneys_assasin 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Isnt the actual date 6/1/6? I heard that in the Guardian and Independent yesterday...5 months to late mate :P
2006-06-07 02:57:10 · answer #2 · answered by thomas p 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In such a big world, I'm sure someone must have been born as an anti-Christ. On an average, 50 children are born every minute here in India .. so there must be someone around this world. The demon is here already.
2006-06-07 03:00:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Last I checked "0" is a significant number! The mark of the beast is 666, no zeros.
2006-06-07 02:58:29 · answer #4 · answered by want2flybye 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHAT!!!!! NERO HAS RESURRECTED!!! oh my, do you think he'll persecute christians in america like he did rome?? do you think he'll burn it!??? and what if his great uncle caligula comes too!!! oh no!!! oh no!!! JUST A JOKE FOLKS. those who have taken an interest in the history of the roman empire will know what i'm talking about.
2006-06-07 03:01:27 · answer #5 · answered by vanessa w 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AntiChrist:? Who is that?? HE IS doomed even if he is born
2006-06-07 02:58:11 · answer #6 · answered by Jol Q and A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. i think he has already been born.
2006-06-07 03:00:52 · answer #7 · answered by notthemamas1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HE ALREADY BORN AND LIVING IN SOMEWHERE IN EASTERN COASTAL AREA
2006-06-07 03:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by public_servent 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course not
2006-06-07 03:38:00 · answer #9 · answered by renoz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-06-07 03:05:40 · answer #10 · answered by Wendy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋