Who is responsible for these misleading unproven facts to further complicate our youngsters at school? Is it an alternative way to inject Creatioinism into the curriculum?
2006-06-06 09:50:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Einstein, an avowed atheist, opined that if there was a "God," he was expressed in the orderliness of the universe. That off-hand remark became the basis for bible thumpers to alter their argument to one of "intelligent design" when their "creationism" argument was rejected.
They are attempting to conceal their illogical argument in a cloak of science to give it legitimacy, but it is still the same old tired argument.
And Einstein never suggested the universe was "created" by anyone or anything, yet bible thumpers claim Einstein supports their arguments.
Creationism relies on accepting the idea that the complexity of the universe (and orderliness) are proof that they were created. Yet, they cannot explain how their creator came into existence.
Creationism is neither science nor a theory, it is contradictory nonsense that relies on magic as its basis.
2006-06-06 09:56:25 · answer #1 · answered by Left the building 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Morons like you are the exact reason why my kids will stay out of public school. I really don't care if they teach "Intelligent Design" or Creationism in public schools because my kids won't be going to be brainwashed with your evolution theories that are now no longer considered only theories but fact.
I think it is a wasted effort for conservatives to try to push this into schools because the right thing to do is to take their kids out of these screwed up public schools and put them in private schools or homeschool them.
Evolution theory is just as "misleading and unproven" and it is a THEORY not a fact as they are trying to indoctrinate everybody.
2006-06-06 10:10:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intelligent Design is more politically correct than saying creationism because Creationism has traditionally been used by Christians. Since schools now try not to associate with any religion, they call it intelligent design so that it could fit many faiths.
2006-06-06 09:53:57 · answer #3 · answered by onemoreordinaryday 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is absolutely a way to put creationism is the classroom curriculum. It is so funny that the far-right decries things that are "PC" yet they call creationism intelligent design...isn't that just a more PC way to say it?
2006-06-06 09:54:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intelligent design is a euphamism for 'god poofed everything into existence by magic'.
Yes, it's creationism in disguise.
2006-06-06 10:12:16 · answer #5 · answered by lenny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have never heard that expression used unless it refered to computer, computer programs, software, etc. As in, this application is an intelligent design.
2006-06-06 09:54:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's politics mixing with religion - a bad combination.
2006-06-06 09:53:08 · answer #7 · answered by mikeandrachael2004 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is the pseudo-science of mixing religion with science.
2006-06-06 09:54:54 · answer #8 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are trying to mix pseudoscience with religion so they can get their creationism in schools
2006-06-06 11:57:46 · answer #9 · answered by mattdaimao 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People needed a more scientific-sounding way to say "God did it!".
2006-06-06 09:54:20 · answer #10 · answered by Not Allie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋