Has any evidence of creationism ever been discovered?

Question

Heythere: There has been 150 years of study, experiment, and evidence that PROVES the theory of evolution to be valid. where? Go to school, or any museum, ask any credible scientist. The evidence is everywhere.

byhisgrace: Your 3rd site is a complete fraud.

Answer 1

no, unless throwing up your hands and saying "god did it!" because something's seemingly too complicated counts.

Answer 2

All the world displays the works of a divine creator. This is seen in the little things like how water, which sustains every bit of life on this earth, can be in the form of liquid, gas and ice just at the right temperatures so that we don't freeze or evaporate. Just think about anatomy. I can't see how anyone could imagine the complex inter workings of something as complicated as an ear or the heart to be a result of an evolutionary process. Of course there isn't any scientific proof that says the earth was created on this day however many years ago but you have to remember that God is above any idea of science. You can't capture God's creation into a scientific method so I don't think you can come up with hard proof of creationism like the 'evidence' presented by evolutionists. One of the supporting reasons for creation is basically the opposition to evolution; it just doesn't make any sense. I'm sure you've heard this before but it's just like taking a bunch of parts, putting it in a bag, shaking it and turning out a working watch. What are the chances of that? That's pretty much impossible. If you want more reasons for why creationism is true there's a book called, Know Why You Believe: Connecting Faith and Reason by Paul Little that gives answers for people looking for ways to rationalize Christianity. Even though it was written mostly for people who are Christians and believe these things anyways it really helps to understand why, which is a question that seems to go unanswered a lot.

Answer 3

Your question is written from a totally scientific viewpoint. Having a doctorate in science myself, I can understand you viewpoint and used to think the same way.

However, there are some things that science does not address. Some types of evidence are historical; ie, they only happened once. This would be the case with the creation of the universe as we know it, and would therefore not be a reproducible, verifiable process. You might as well try to scientifically prove that I ate a ham and cheese sandwich yesterday morning, but you couldn't prove I did. Or scientifically prove that Homer existed, but you couldn't.

Take for example your own birth. Some would argue that you couldn't even prove that. Birth certificates can be forged. Sure, we have your parents word for it, but people lie. We have some evidence of it, but it is not 100.000000% proof to some people until you can reproduce it (ie, your birth) in a lab.

If we were to "rewind" time back to the Big Bang, we could see the entire mass of the universe collapsing into a ball. There would reach a critical mass-to-volume ratio where the laws of physics no longer apply. (How can you have the entire mass of the universe in the space of one quark? Or 1 millionth of that space? ) The laws of physics no longer applies. Science as you know it no longer applies. In other words, science is worthless in this situation.

What force caused the spontaneous creation of the universe? The "evolutionists" have no answer to this, but the "creationists" have an answer.

(I abhor the term "evolutionist," by the way, because although I believe in God and the Bible, my Bible does not exclude the process of adaptation or evolution).

Answer 4

One, we are here. Also has there ever been a transitional phase truly discovered. Evolution is more of a stretch scientifically than creationism. Things are still in place as the original. Isn"t it funny how things get based in time cycles no one can develop a control on?

Answer 5

Matter of fact yes if you open the Bible it says it plainly mostly on the first page but sometimes it might be on the second page...but it says God created man in his OWN image and thats enough evidence for me.

Answer 6

Yes they have, but not like the religious factions want you to believe. Man, was indeed "created" in god's image and likeness, but the "god" was another living being who preformed genetic manipulation on a creature who was already here.

Answer 7

are we talking to children here,

i keep reading this answer, look around you, look at nature thats evidence of god

what about the flying spaghetti monster arguement,

this must be a massive brainwashing or drugging on this people,

Answer 8

Of course not! it's like asking if anyone's seen Harry P in real life.

Answer 9

Yes. I believe they found God's thumbprint on the far side of the moon.

Answer 10

No, the dinosaurs ate the evidence.

Answer 11

I've posted a response to this several times on this forum. Here we go again. Please read them and be educated.