English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Point of the question is to consider
the Law Law of Mt 22: 36-40 loves
in relation to Law Law of Rom 8:2.
In both cases both are notably "law".
"Ye are not under the law, but under grace".

Your comments?

2006-06-06 01:26:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Point (from Mt 22 & Rom 8 "law law"):
"the law" of the Spirit(of error) no more makes anyone free of "the law" of sin and death, than the law of aerodynamics makes anyone free of the law of gravity. Sooner or later the second gives place to the first. And the second is notably like the first in Mt 22 (it's law), and the first law in Rom 8 law law is notably sin and death, not salvation nor freedom. Hello?

2006-06-08 09:54:18 · update #1

6 answers

YOU STILL CRASH.

2006-06-06 01:28:59 · answer #1 · answered by romadgo 4 · 1 0

First of all, aerodynamics has absolutely nothing to do with your question. If the power exiting the jets ceases, the plane would start a downward plunge. Now, the aerodynamics comes into play. Since there are wings to cause drag or glide, it would be enough to interrupt the law of gravity. This would actually cause a slight adjustment to the (.5) 32 computation. Since the planes are so large, the glide or draig would be a slight factor that would alter the (.5) 32, but still produce a near exacting end result of a plane load of people dying.
If we use the modern day equations of gravity being a force, the F=Gm1m2/d2 would definitely come into play.
Now, if there were a plane nose diving towards the earth, we would have a force greater than the elementary (.5) 32 and would add to the force equation. We would then know the amount of force, the X factor if you wish; that factor would actually give you a + F=Gm1m2/d2 or possibly a > F=Gm1m2/d2. But to add factors to (.5) 32 would be baseless with the question you have asked. If the force factors were to cause the plane to reach its best speed; it would be possible to double the F=Gm1m2/d2, if there was an intentional glide path within the structured (.5) 32. The Japanese scientists understood this model of the equation to use their airplanes as missiles.

2006-06-06 08:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by Calvin of China, PhD 6 · 0 0

soooo, Mt. 22:36-40 speaks of the two greatest commandments under the Law, and Rom 8:2 says "For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of sin and of death"

And your point is what? That because we are above the Law that the statement conflicts? Wow, do you ever miss the point lol. It's the entire theme of Jesus' teachings. The point that He tried to make to the Jews over and over and over is that it is not about following every letter of the law, it is about what's in your heart toward God.

He's saying that if you genuinely love God, you will follow the law naturally. Don't you understand how bad it was for the Jews at that time? There were not just the 10 commandments, there were also 360 other commands from Moses to follow, of which the Jews by the time of Christ had developed over a thousand "laws" that must be followed. It was impossible to achieve legality!

Jesus came and said, look, it's not about me picking corn on Sabbath, it's about me taking care of my people. It's what is in the heart. It's not about not touching the dying man on the road because you'll be legally unclean for 7 days, it's about caring for the hurting people in your path. Even if you hate them. It's what is in the heart.

Get it? You aren't under the law, you are under grace.

2006-06-06 08:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 0 0

The airplanes crash. The people aboard take the consequences.

Matthew and Romans are speaking spiritually. The laws of gravity and aerodynamics are physical laws. That which is spiritual is not necessarily that which is physical.

2006-06-06 08:34:56 · answer #4 · answered by Einsteinetta 6 · 0 0

Aerodynamics are based on Gravity!
I could not understand the note beneath your question!

2006-06-06 08:28:31 · answer #5 · answered by soubassakis 6 · 0 0

what the hell are you talking about?

2006-06-06 08:29:26 · answer #6 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers