2006-06-05 19:42:37 · 18 answers · asked by cryptsymbolxxx 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Answer according to ur consceince and strenght of belief
2006-06-05 19:54:44 · update #1
Answer according to ur consceince and strength of belief
2006-06-05 19:55:43 · update #2
yes I do. Not because of any novel out there. I have believed this for years. I base this on the Bible itself.
1) In John chapter 2 Mary (Mother) goes to Jesus and tells him that the wine is gone. According to Jewish tradition only the Groom is responsible for the wedding feast. Unless he was the groom why would Mary care about the wine being gone and why would Christ risk offending the Groom and his family by interviening by turning the water to wine and therefore making more wine for the feast.
2) Under Jewish tradition only a married man could be a Rabbi. So unless he had married he could not have been called Rabbi.
3) Mary M. helped dress his body for burrial. Unless she was a wife, sister, mother or aunt dressng a body (seeing a man nude, even dead) was not allowed. It would have been an obseane act on her part. Since we know she was not sister, mother or aunt that would leave wife.
4) The very first person he appeared to after his reserection was Mary M. That would be an act I accociate with a spouse other wise it would have been an aposle or other family member.
5) Now why was it not spelled out clearer in the Bible? Maybe it was a given and the writers of the Gospels included in the Bible didn't think it was important enough to mention beyond what they did. Or may be it was discussed clearer in books that were not included in the Bible. Or maybe out of respect for Mary M and to avoid her being disparraged as Jesus as been they choose not to be clear about her relationship with Christ.
Now did they have any children? I have no idea, I don't think this is important to go into further. But I do think we should acknowledge what Christ taught us and follow him as he is our Savior and Messiah, that he died for us. This is what is important not these other things.
2006-06-05 20:46:03 · answer #1 · answered by idaho gal 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
sure, besides the undeniable fact that it replaced into no longer a sexual or romantic love. Jesus replaced into the Son of God and in no way sinned, and he wasn't married to Mary Magdalene, so there is not any way he had any irrelevant touch together with her.
2016-11-14 06:50:43 · answer #2 · answered by garneau 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ten years ago, no one could even dream of imagining such a question. It was just a movie to stir up a bunch of crap. Do you believe that Michelangelo was blind? Was Buddha gay? Is George W. Bush 100% truthful to the American people? Jesus Christ was never married. If he was, why didn't Mary file for Social Security benefits? Come on folks, if you believe in God, then you already know the answer to that one in your heart, mind and soul.
2006-06-05 20:29:13 · answer #3 · answered by Rollover Mikey 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont believe. Mary Magdalene is a lady who came with other women early in the morning to Jesus' tomb to see if he is still there.She was the among the first women who knew that Jesus has risen and declared the good news to the disciples
2006-06-05 19:52:10 · answer #4 · answered by reachkli 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is very possible. I also think it is not necessary for me to decide to believe for sure, one way or the other. Once again, I'd like to offer the position of "suspending judgment," at least pending more evidence. It is not necessary that all of us decide and believe or disbelieve on every issue the moment the question is raised. It is OK to take a position on the fence, and stay there as long as you like.
In politics, there comes a voting day, and to suspend judgment on that day is to defer to the will of others who do vote. In most other issues, putting off the decision to believe or disbelieve is not harmful. Take your time to examine the evidence, and whether the evidence is sufficient, before you make a judgment.
2006-06-05 19:50:33 · answer #5 · answered by auntb93again 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anywhere and anytime, rumors and lies are always there...just as those time of Jesus when He was on earth, so don't believe such single rumors. Jesus is the Son of God, the Holy One, He was the perfect One who didn't make even a single of sin. He was only here to spread around the true Word of God.
The Word of God warns us of false teachers who "secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them" (2 Peter 2:21, NIV) — and stresses the importance of "speaking the truth in love" (Ephesians 4:15).
2006-06-05 20:47:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, nor did she bare any of his children. She followed along with his disciples and provided what would have been considered at that time the typical female duties of any entourage. She is not the Mary who had seven demons removed from her either.
2006-06-05 19:47:50 · answer #7 · answered by dph_40 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he was married to mary magdelene, would you take from Him, his divinity or humanity? I believe nor disbelieve it. It is were true or not, he is still my LORD and SAVIOUR and my KING, nothing will change that.
2006-06-05 19:46:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! And to say otherwise is "adding" words to the Bible. That carries a curse with it.
2006-06-05 19:46:41 · answer #9 · answered by euhmerist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Muslims would deny it. We also deny that she bore his child.
But everything else in the de vinci code was agreed upon.
2006-06-05 19:47:56 · answer #10 · answered by LeScorned 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋