Is anybody else sick of all the attention that ESPN gives to women golfers attempting to 'invade' the men's tournaments?
Please do not attack me as sexist or whatever... the question pertains to the fact that there IS a seperation from the men's and women's tournaments... and whether or not you think the women can compete and whether or not ESPN overdoes their coverage of any woman trying to compete.
Also does anyone honestly believe a woman could earn a living if they played with the men full time? Or what women think if men invaded their tournaments probably making it impossible for them to ever win again?
But specifically I'm sickened by the coverage that ESPN gives to any female that is trying to compete like they just did with Wie. It's like they are overcompensating to try and prove they honestly think it's a good thing... when I doubt that anyone there really does.
Your thoughts? Especially any women out there.
2006-06-05
18:38:16
·
6 answers
·
asked by
theroyalone69
1
in
Sports
➔ Golf
Ummm... the question wasn't are women's sports as GOOD as men's... it was whether or not ESPN overdoes coverage of a female golfer trying to invade a man's tournament... and whether or not a female golfer should even be trying to compete with men in general?
That's why there is a seperation in sports.
I never said I didn't enjoy watching women's golf.. or softball... or soccer.
But that doesn't mean I think the 2 'leagues' should be intertwined.
2006-06-05
20:52:27 ·
update #1