taken from brad stine, i presume? that's where i heard it first anyway.
2006-06-05 12:00:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by lordaviii 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I choose number 2. How can someone be offended by someone that they don't think exist. I find it kind of hilarious that so many people will come on here and argue the non-existence of God. If you don't believe than what is the point. Why is it even an issue for you.
Love & Light
Sharon
One Planet = One People
2006-06-05 11:57:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by skippingsunday 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello dig_digi2.. :)
I would say neither..because it does not take an irrational person to believe in God..it takes Faith..
Nor are those that are offended by hearing about God irrational..for they do not have the Holy Spirit to reveal unto them the Truth..
In Jesus Most Precious Name..
With Love..In Christ..
2006-06-05 11:59:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by EyeLovesJesus 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first since the second doesn't make any sense. How can someone be offended by something he doesn't believe exists? I would call that impossible, not irrational.
2006-06-05 11:56:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Spiritual atheist speaking. For me personally, I see the latter as more irrational. Why should I be offended by something I don't believe in? :-)
2006-06-05 11:59:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nikki 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
#1 If you believe in GOD you know He is a spirit. A spirit can not be seen but can be believed in. Therefore it is irrational to think that GOD will be seen as you already know that He is felt in the heart, mind, body & soul but not seen by the human eye.
2006-06-05 15:19:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he doesn't believe in God, how can he be offended by him? Perhaps Satan is the one offending him. He offends a lot of people,including me.
2006-06-05 11:58:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Micah 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Spiritual logic and eathly logic are not the same. I don't have to see God with my eyes to know that He exists.
2006-06-05 12:07:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The second is more irrational.
2006-06-05 11:51:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dukie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Accepting both options as workable it would be number two.
2006-06-05 11:58:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by drg5609 6
·
0⤊
0⤋