Batista won the match at Summerslam by dq, and he doesn't get a rematch. I am probably one of the people who most wants to see him out of the title picture, but not by that kind of lackluster way. And how in the hell do you logically cap off a feud, even it is a Khali feud, with a dq on the second biggest ppv of the year?
Then last night the guys feuding for the US title win the tag team titles. Doesn't this sound eerily similar to a factor in the HBK/Cena feud that was utterly pointless? Or as TNA has shown us, putting one than one title on a person ruins a lot of those title's credibilities. How in the hell is this supposed to help a feud that really didn't need any help in the first place?
2007-09-01
00:26:01
·
9 answers
·
asked by
jm42445
5