You know the WWE claims that they aren't threatened by TNA, but having Umaga have an undefeated streak that awfully resembles TNA's Samoa Joe's storyline in which Samoa Joe didn't lose at all in 2005 or 2006 until he finally lost to Kurt Angle last night to Kurt Angle at Genesis. I am a WWE fan more than a TNA fan, but the very idea that Umaga is anywhere near as good as Samoa Joe is is completely laughable! Samoa Joe is not only a good brawler, he is also very quick for his size, he has martial arts skills, and he is an extremely good technical and submission wrestler. The point is that there is no simularites and this undefeated streak needs to end. I am not saying that there is no way Umaga (Eddie Fatu) can't become a great wrestler (it runs in his family with people like The Rock, Yokozuna, and Jimmy "The Superfly" Snuka) but he is not ready to be in the WWE Title hunt. What do you think?
2006-11-20
13:50:38
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Thomas C
4