English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-31 16:38:56 · 22 answers · asked by Bauer Power 3 in Politics & Government Elections

I think he will say or do anything to get elected. I don't think his attacks on McCain or Huck are fair.

2007-12-31 16:45:43 · update #1

22 answers

They will ALL say ANYTHING just to get elected. That is the point. What is unfortunate is that the public will just vote for who they hate the least instead of coming together and electing an Independent or demanding better candidates. :-/

2007-12-31 16:54:09 · answer #1 · answered by stace1814 3 · 2 1

No. I do not think that Mitt is dishonest.

His ads about McCain and Huckabee were factual. I want to know those kinds of things about the candidates BEFORE the primary so I can be an informed voter. The information will come out during the general election from the dems. I don't want any surprises AFTER the primaries are over.

The candidate who I think is the most dishonest is huckabee. He makes an ad against Romney but then calls a news conference to say that he is much too honest and Christian to air it. But, invites the media to watch and air it. What a sleezy guy he is. He must think that we are a nation of idiots not to see through him and his dirty stunts. If he really had a conviction to not show ads about his competition he would NOT have shown the ad to anyone, much less the media.

He had ethics problems in AR, old huck hasn't changed much since he left.

2008-01-01 02:04:40 · answer #2 · answered by LDS girl 5 · 0 1

Why would you think his "attacks" on John McCain and Mike Huckabee are unfair? Do you even know what he said about them? He said that McCain used to be opposed to President Bush's tax cuts but now wants to make them permanent. He said that Huckabee pardoned over a thousand felons and raised taxes by the billions as governor, which he did.

Huckabee saying that Mitt Romney is being unfair is like a defendant in a burglary trial saying that a video of him breaking into a home is unfair evidence to present at trial and that the prosecutor should apologize for showing it to the jury. There is nothing dishonest about what Romney is doing with these ads.

2007-12-31 22:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by Paper Mage 5 · 1 0

Mitt Romney is NOT a "career politician." He's served one term as Mass. Governor. If anything, he is a career businessman, successful at that. Dishonest? No. Has he changed his views on certain issues? Yes, and he has been honest about it. I'm really getting annoyed by the whole "who is more anti-abortion" etc. crap. I'm not coming to Romney's rescue, but out of all of the GOP candidates I believe he is the candidate.

2007-12-31 20:37:27 · answer #4 · answered by Bkizzle 2 · 2 1

the two. He did not think of that the protection tension replaced into nicely worth even a point out in his popularity speech. it somewhat is plenty the comparable as whilst Mitt dodged the draft to pass proselytize ladies interior the south of France. could he be elected, he will discover that Ryan and Cantor will cope with him with much extra disdain than they did Boehner; they'll tell him what to do and he will remind him that he's President, he will have the identify, yet would be powerless, he has no constituency. The Democrats see him for what he isn't, a pacesetter, and the Republicans see him for what he's, a coward. i come across it thrilling that there exists a inhabitants who do not see Romney for the guy he's. He can not discover Iran on a map, he thinks that the Iranians desire Syria for their sea coast. He thinks the size of an only approximately 18th century military has relevance in a time of stealth technologies, nuclear warships, drones and cyber conflict. He lied on the stand, to cheat the female who replaced into married to the CEO of Staples, with the intention to cheat her out of her honest proportion of community assets, for those ex-husbands who're obtainable cheering, she supported her husband and his fledgling business enterprise till he dumped her. Mitt only helped a bud cheat his quickly to be ex. that's the comparable Mitt who undervalued shares in his retirement portfolio, to ward off the criminal limits on worker contributions, he additionally controlled the dividends for those shares, so he would desire to sell them after leveraging the agencies he replaced into working for and assemble tax deferred in retirement fund the spoils, till now he bought then valueless shares of agencies quickly to pass abdomen up. Vulture capitalism in action. some thing this is incredibly troubling to me as a female, Romney and the GOP are ineffective set on bringing toddlers into this worldwide (bullet stoppers possibly?) Too undesirable they don't provide A RAT'S *** approximately THEM whilst they are BORN. All those previous white adult adult males who do not desire to have their useful taxes pay for (something yet conflict) welfare, guidance tips, well-being care or different social classes that could help feed, domicile and teach the toddlers they desire to tension women human beings to convey into the worldwide. God knows they don't provide a crap touching directly to the ladies human beings being compelled to convey an undesirable baby into the worldwide. this is all touching directly to the fetus...till this is born. and then they desire not something to do with it.

2016-11-27 02:38:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.

2007-12-31 17:47:36 · answer #6 · answered by LJ 7 · 2 1

I think that of the whole bunch of candidates he would come closest to keeping his campaign promises. That said, I don't think ANY of the current batch of candidates will keep their promises.

There are No Good Choices this election.

2007-12-31 17:14:35 · answer #7 · answered by James E Lewis AKA choteau 7 · 0 1

They say "Birds of the same feather flock together." Romney has flocked around with lobbyists more than all other candidates, except probably, Fred Thompson. He campaihns and tlks like a professional lobbyist. Besides, he's a hypocrite! He's critical of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, but hasn't stopped his campaign from taking donations from lobbyists who receive millions of dollars from Citgo, a Venezuelan government-linked oil company.
http://www.kxmc.com/News/Nation/166662.asp

How can American voters trust having him in the White House to do what's best for the U.S.????

2007-12-31 17:01:19 · answer #8 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 1 1

He's a career politician; that should say enough .

2007-12-31 16:46:49 · answer #9 · answered by alpla 6 · 3 1

I think they are all a bunch of puke buckets. Vote Democratic.

2007-12-31 16:42:53 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers