It isn't justice, in any style, it's a load of @$$ all the way around.
3 women, 7 children and a bunch of elderly men... and the leader claims it was all within military combat rules. If that were true, why did they try to lie about what happened? Also, where does it say in ANY combat rule book that you can kill a bunch of UNARMED citizens?
2007-12-31 16:45:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kitten Toes 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The differnce is that once Khalid replaced into apprehended the warriors did not carry out strikes that could guard the examine (miranda, etc) through fact it regarded sparkling it may be a armed forces conflict trial. NOW that that is a civilian trial their situations are in threat of being tossed out through unsuitable dealing with of evidence besides as no miranda rights given to the detainees. Tim McVeigh and the ninety 3 WTC bombers have been arrested by capacity of way of civilian standards and have been mirandized, so there replaced into no threat of having the case tossed out for loss of civil and constitutional rights. EDIT: Logically that is a project, appropriately. think of roughly it, a choose is compelled to correctly known shape breaches with regard to the accused as they're deemed harmless till shown in charge and are risk-free decrease than comprehensive DISCLOSURE of the Constitutional rights. If a legal expert argues efficiently that an enemy combatant wasnt given miranda case in point on the time of capture for the time of a conflict, properly the choose very virtually has no different determination yet to work out that for what that is in his civilian courtroom. AND, what does Glenn Beck could do with this answer? And greater so, who pronounced Eric Holder replaced right into a Muslim sympathizer? I havent watched Beck in approximately 3 weeks.
2016-12-18 13:59:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well condidering he didn't do anything.Were you there? If you were a witness maybe you should come forward.
2007-12-31 17:32:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ak6702 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
He's being held responsible. The Justice system, especially military justice, is a complicated thing, and I'd bet that the penalties for the charges he's facing are far heavier in military court than they are in civilian court.
I also read once that most court martials lead to convictions. That's why his JAG lawyers probably fought like nobody's business to see to it that he didn't face murder charges. There may be a plea deal in the making. It's not unusual in the legal system. It's just the way it works, but military justice is a bit more harsh than civilian justice.
2007-12-31 17:20:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
War makes good people do bad things. Let's bring home all our good people.
2007-12-31 17:04:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
lol, i guess it is when bush is prez...
2007-12-31 16:30:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by STOP!!! 3
·
1⤊
3⤋