English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What does our U.S. Constitution say about using funds at the Federal level?

What should be funded with our tax dollars?

Certainly funding abortions is not one of them.

Funding special interest groups such as college funds for races is also not one of them either as the Constitution forbids racism and prejudism against people.

Financing foreign nations with our tax dollars is also not Constitutional. Giving foreign aid is different from policing a nation and forcing our government on them.

So what is the Federal government really supposed to finance besides our military?

2007-12-31 14:01:44 · 5 answers · asked by Naturescent 4 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

Our Founding Fathers gave us a Constitution and a Bill of Rights that give us FREEDOM and RESPONSIBILITY. Those two go hand-in -hand and cannot be separated.
If we want freedom, we MUST be self-reliant.
It is unconstitutional for the Government to take from a hard working family to use those needed funds for their self-righteous causes and promote themselves!
NEVER vote for a politician that says he wants to raise your taxes. He is a TYRANT and is violating his Oath of Office!Money is power and that politician is taking your POWER for his own benefit.
Giving from the heart is CHARITY.
Gifts via the power of the IRS are EXTORTION!

2007-12-31 14:11:32 · answer #1 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2 2

in the united kingdom approximately 15 years in the past the government replaced community taxation so as that anybody paid the comparable, regardless of income or materials cost. in addition they presented the hot regulation in Scotland a year till now than something of the rustic. hundreds refused to pay and a great form of went to penal complex. the government disregarded the protests till the cities on the brink of London began protesting. It strengthen into hastily withdrawn. the factor is that there would desire to be a huge coalition for it to artwork. government would desire to experience decrease than tension. it would take a severe-profile, credible, charismatic chief to tug this off. As for the Boston Tea party, i do no longer think of that had something to do with the cost itself. It strengthen into extra to do with the concept of a British employer being given exemptions that no person else have been given. Edit: Cherokee is misguided approximately earning being taxed two times. companies get to deduct wages paid from their gross income, so as that they do no longer pay income tax on the wages paid out. The tax withheld is given as a credit in the guy's return. inner gross revenues Code area a million rates income tax. area sixty one, as amplified via area sixty 3, rates tax on wages and salaries.

2016-10-10 18:32:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

This is probably the BEST question I have seen since I have been in this forum.

So I am just going to sit back and see what is said. Thank you for the information in your definition and how true it is.

2007-12-31 14:13:32 · answer #3 · answered by Innocent 6 · 1 2

"provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States"

2007-12-31 14:06:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Benefits for illegals --- according to Dems.

2007-12-31 14:04:46 · answer #5 · answered by Duminos 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers