Oh, wow
the second picture was when she had more money.
XD
2007-12-31 13:51:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. real
2. fake, although she looks real.
i dunno actually! I never pay attention to the spice girls. thats who they are right?
2007-12-31 22:02:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
#2 is fake
2007-12-31 21:57:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm gonna have to say the first one is real.
2007-12-31 21:56:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by yeahvictoria 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pic 1-before surgery.Pic 2-after surgery.
2007-12-31 21:53:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Soapy_Raindrop 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it shows what money can buy
2007-12-31 21:53:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the small ones in the black bikini are real
other 2, fake
2007-12-31 21:53:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by jasper 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh EWWW she is foul.
The first one is far more natural, before she had al her 'work done' and lost the plot. WHY do women think they look more attractive turning them selves into a plastic doll? Men would most likely find the first natural (brunette) one of her far more sexy.
2007-12-31 21:53:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Renesme 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
On the girl with dark hair-it doesnt appear that she's had anythng done. Vis a vis Mrs. Beckman-it doesnt appear that she has any real parts. Just my opinion.
2007-12-31 21:52:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by techtwosue 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1st- Fake background, real girl.
2nd- Real background - photochop girl. Her crotch looks photochop.
2007-12-31 21:52:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm afraid I'm going to accidentally pick the dude, but I think #2 is the real girl. What's the deal?
2007-12-31 21:52:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Captain S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋