appeasement or collective security?
could you give me a thesis with subtopics? ty
2007-12-31 13:27:20 · 6 answers · asked by M.A. 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Appeasement is only effective with people that have no grand ambitions. Unfortunately people that must be appeased always have grand ambitions. Now, neither appeasement or collective security are guaranteed to prevent a war. If the guys is determined enough he'll start a war eventually anyway. But with collective security you are in a position to respond to the threat much more effectively.
2007-12-31 19:32:17 · answer #1 · answered by rohak1212 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dear,
The Starting of the Second World War ll. Adolf Hitler "seize" Czechoslovakia in August 1939.
August, 1939. Hitler concluded a nonaggression pact with the Soviet Union and a week later invaded Poland to start the World War ll.
2008-01-01 03:15:30 · answer #2 · answered by AHMAD FUAD Harun 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The World wasn't plunged into war in 1939. A European war began then, which became a world war in 1941.
2007-12-31 18:13:31 · answer #3 · answered by gravybaby 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
WWII was the result of the inherent conflict between competing nation-states for markets and resourses.
Nobody ever appeased Hitler. Chamberlain thought he had a deal with Hitler to push him east to take on the Soviet Union. Chamberlain was complicit with Hitler, but Hitler played him for a fool.
2007-12-31 13:31:32 · answer #4 · answered by Mencken 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I have studied WWII for many years. There is a simple and interesting answer to your homework question...I hope you enjoy finding it
2007-12-31 13:31:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Appeasement did not work, as Neville Chamberlain found out, and beyond that, you will need to do your own research.
2007-12-31 13:30:52 · answer #6 · answered by bgee2001ca 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋