Definitely blissful ignorance. Then you can blame everything on someone else. Knowledge generally just creates more questions.
2008-01-02 16:48:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mythological Beast 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is possible to be so learned that you are at peace with what you know, and accept it as a good thing. That is blissful knowledge. So I have to go with that one.
2007-12-31 21:44:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mysterious Bob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When one comes to the Highest Truth that is the most Blissful. It is the between ignorance and knowledge that is so painful. It is a process and everyone has to eventually go through it in one life or another. So really blissfully knowledgeable is so much more blissful ultimately.
2007-12-31 15:54:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I won't pick apart your question, I believe I get it.
To be blissfully ignorant would to me be the more truthful statement.
Blissful (enjoying) ignorance is simply the more truthful "idea" in that being happily ignorant of something allows that you don't even realize that you are in fact ignorant of something.
Whereas blissful knowledge, albeit the more noble choice.....once gained may initially be blissful, but at some point become unfavorable. Perhaps even causing one to wish for their former status of blissful ignorance.
The idea of being blissful or happy about your status ignorance / knowledge is what was "key" to my answer, I hope I understood you correctly.
2007-12-31 14:42:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by mchlmybelle 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Knowledge, definitely. I believe that ignorance is one of the major faults of mankind, more or less the term "blissful ignorance". Ignorance may be bliss for a short period of time, but it's better to be blissfully knowledgeable
2007-12-31 14:31:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by sk8tbrdswdtw 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
All depends on your view. When a flag was moving, you may say our mind is moving. A half full glass may be half empty.
Ignorance is the major driving force for learning or research; whereas knowledge limited our mind to have alternative view or adopt other views.
An old Chinese saying: When you thought, you know a lot, you know little; when you know nothing, you know knowledge.
2007-12-31 14:13:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by giginotgigi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
blissfully knowledgeable implies a choice whereas blissful ignorance does not it's up to you or not. I like the quote from Time Bandits that goes like something like this;" Oh how wonderful it must be to be free from the ravages of intelligence."
2007-12-31 14:12:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
knowledgeable, especially if you are knowingly ignorant becuase then you will always wonder and have a nagging thought about what you might be missing if you were knowledgeable.
2007-12-31 13:55:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by bradwissmueller 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
WHICH is more true... not WHAT. When you know the choices, you use 'which'.
Both states are blissful, but one has the added benefit of knowledge...what do you think?
2007-12-31 13:46:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sorry my understanding of the the proper grammatical inference, of the English Language. Makes a huge difference in this quesion, as per;
" What is more, true. Blissful ignorance or blissfully knowledgeable.
Is this, the correct interpretation.
I put it to you, that in this case a combination of both phrases. Is what makes perfect sense;
"Truthfulness comes from blissfully knowledgeable, ignorance."
2007-12-31 13:32:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Trent 4
·
1⤊
1⤋