I don't understand all the controversy over the cause of death. Does it really matter if she died by bullet or if she hit her head on the sunroof as a result of the explosion? She is tragically dead either way.
2007-12-31 09:29:12 · 11 answers · asked by mpalmernyc 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If someone got close enough for an accurate head shot, that would mean a security lapse. A security lapse could be through negligence, design, or a mistake. By opening up the first two, accusations can be made against the Mushariff government (whether true or not doesn't matter - just like in USA politics) which could destabilize it and or lead to more violence. The government has a vested interest in making people believe that a bomb - much more difficult to stop by a security detail, is believed to have killed her and her party and the Islamo-fascists both have a vested interest in making people believe the opposite. Bottom line to me is, though, that she intentionally stuck her head and upper torso outside the protective area of her bomb proof car - even her own security people would have told her that was not the thing to do. It was a calculated risk that she lost; the rest is just typical power politics.
2007-12-31 10:23:40 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are correct there isn't a difference.
However if she tripped, fell, hit her head, died. Then got shot in the neck and a person spontaneously combusted (killing 20 people) within a few seconds, that is just down right bizarre.
2008-01-01 19:00:10 · answer #2 · answered by ! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Musharraff doesn't want her death to be considered martyrdom. If she was shot in the head she is a martryr and her status is more revered because she died for her beliefs.
If she fell and hit her head it was an accident and she isn't a martyr. Just a tragic accident. No big deal.
2007-12-31 22:43:11 · answer #3 · answered by SusieQ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
insurance.
2007-12-31 21:31:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the corrupt government has changed its story mutiple times.
2007-12-31 20:58:10 · answer #5 · answered by zombi86 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's kind of like the Kennedy assassination. People want to know if their government or some other government is killing their leaders. God forbid, but if President Bush was murdered, I think that I'd want to know if one of his American political opponents had him killed or if some foreign government was involved. It's tragic when it's just some crazy on the street who kills a government leader; however, it's much more serious and historically significant if that same leader is murdered by his or some other government.
2007-12-31 18:41:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's the not knowing if pres m's supporters smashed her skull in at the hospital or if it was the al q fella
2007-12-31 18:31:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the controversy's over why the government lied about how she died? is it 2 cover their own truth? that they were the cause of her death coz they saw her as a threat
2007-12-31 18:01:44 · answer #8 · answered by ησяєєη 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well the snowball will get bigger and the fact that US had people that was gaurding her when she died will come into play soon. It seems to me that a book deal was in the works the second she died and everyone envolvle wanted their royalty.
2007-12-31 17:49:27 · answer #9 · answered by wreaser2000 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that the controversy is more about why the government/dr/who ever would lie about how she died.
I agree though--either way their was a gunman who was trying to kill her and an explosion that seemingly was also aimed at assasinating her so in any of the 3 scenarios she ends up dead.
2007-12-31 17:38:25 · answer #10 · answered by Zhedray 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋