Code of Hammurabi and the modern U.S. law system?

Question

Tell me your opinion of how you think The Code of Hammurabi and our modern U.S. law system is both similiar or different. please and thank you! if you can, please provide evidence,specific examples, to support an argument on how they are both similar and/or different.

links to help:
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi
http://www.reference.com/search?r=13&q=U.S.%20Law

reply a.s.a.p, thank you.

Answer 1

The primary similarity is the concept of a fixed law itself. In most cultures of the time the law was simply whatever the ruler said it was. Hammurabi set his laws down in stone for all to see, so that men could know what they were - or were not - allowed to do.

The other big difference, even from earlier written laws - was that Hammurabi's code for the first time included a civil aspect. There are older written legal codes, but they were all exclusively criminal in nature. Even the 10 commandments are pretty much all "Thou shalt nots". Hammurabi's code, though, included guidelines for his judges to resolve civil disputes between citizens, and even established, for the first time, a law of contracts.

Richard

Answer 2

You of course have not got a clue what you're speaking approximately. The previous testomony, and the recent testomony are 2 countless issues. you're quite hung up in this "faith/Bible/regardless of are purely historical ethical codes/ethic structures/ect. Blah blah. the international desires some form of morals, in any different case the crackhead that kills your mom would be purely as righteous through fact the guy who walks her around the line so she does not get hit by capacity of a driving force texting crap to Yahoo solutions.

Answer 3

holly are you wanting your homework to be done for you? you'll have to pay me for my time