It appears odd that the assassination led to immediate claim by government that it was done by faction associated with Bin Ladin. It is as if the general populace was to be agitated by government/media apparatus to the extent of turning in Bin Ladin as form of retribution?
2007-12-31 05:35:42 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Blaiming everything on Al Qaida nowdays has become easy way out for the Governements.
2007-12-31 08:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by VK 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Larry Craig's wide stance partner did it. Well, that is as good as your theory.
2007-12-31 13:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What would they have to gain? There are a lot better candidates for the blame than Western nations.
2007-12-31 13:48:42 · answer #3 · answered by Othniel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In time there will be an abundance of theories put forward as to why, wherefore,and who,
This posted one seems a very strange opinion, as I understand it , would it not have been in the interest of the west for her to gain office,??
2007-12-31 13:47:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Talk about delusional.
2007-12-31 13:47:17 · answer #5 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is NO good reason for western governments to want her assasinated, nor any real way for them to have managed to have done this. Someone needs a high-colonic reality enema.
2007-12-31 13:45:07 · answer #6 · answered by Stephen H 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bhutto predicted her assassination. She knew the political climate. The west wanted her in power.
2007-12-31 13:41:18 · answer #7 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I knew it was only a matter of time before the conspiracy theorist came out of the wood work.
2007-12-31 13:39:23 · answer #8 · answered by cmdrbnd007 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋