Yes. Because of her and other other idiots in government (mostly democrats, but also some republicans), we are well on our way. She's basically pandering to those who don't have great wealth promising to give them a portion of the profits from those who earned them. That's called redistribution of wealth, a concept that is socialist in nature and one of the main themes in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. The whole idea of free enterprise is to reward those who go out and work hard for what they want, to be innovators. All she is doing is rewarding people for holding their hands out demanding something for nothing in her welfare system. It's going against everything a system based on free enterprise is about. She adheres to the policy "What's mine is mine, what's your's is mine." I'm sure that's what she'll do if she gets elected, but don't be surprised if she changes her tune to pander to others. She's a snake in the grass and most people don't see it.
2007-12-31 04:49:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Magnus 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm one of those Fox News and Limbaugh fans that Mike O was talking about. Here's a partial list of the Clinton scandals and you tell me if you want more of this in the White House
http://members.tripod.com/~GOPcapitalist/clinton-scandals.html
2007-12-31 13:35:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Absolutely we need Hillary. But she's not a socialist. demanding that corporations be held accountable--andspending tax money on AMERICANS instead of in pointless wars or giveaways to the wealthy--isn't scocialism.
2007-12-31 13:12:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Absolutely not! Socialization would be worse than what we have right now. She is way to high of a risk.
2007-12-31 13:01:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by ~ luv sis 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Of course not. First of all, Hillary's not a socialist, she's a dyed in the wool capitalist. You can take any remark you please and twist it like a pretzel to suggest she is, but it won't change the fact that she's not. If she were a socialist? She couldn't do much without the approval of Congress. Why is it that those brainiacs who get panic attacks when their pundit heroes call Hillary a socialist, don't know how their country works? They seem to think a socialist could simply become President and single-handedly change our entire government system into something it's not. Presidents have very limited power and couldn't accomplish this on their own, or force us into a "socialist system," even if they wished to. So unless you think that Congress and the DOJ are going to jump right on board and say "Hey yeah, let's be socialists now," your fears are groundless.
EDIT:
ndmagic:
Amen to that.
2007-12-31 12:58:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
If a NeoCon is elected, we'll continue to give all our money to the oil companies like a good Christian nation should.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1841989
Lee Raymond thanks you for your lack of common sense.
Magnus, I guess you think Lee Raymond earned this, huh? Did he add some sort of magic sauce to gasoline to make it more efficient? This is nothing more than upper class theft.
And yet you right wingers are up in arms when an African American gets caught robbing a store or something. The only difference between that and Raymond is the color of skin and the lack of a weapon. Raymond and the oil companies committed theft, plain and simple.
Magnus..."What's mine is mine, what's your's is mine."
I thought that was the NeoCon oil policy.
Will--your list forgot "CheesecakeWednesdaygate"
The scandal of Bill Clinton eating Cheesecake on a Wednesday.
That's how ridiculous that list is.
2007-12-31 12:57:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I can name 2 people that I really hope don't get elected for president..... CLINTON OR OBAMA........If either one of them get into office, then we are really in for trouble.
2007-12-31 12:46:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by peacefrogzs 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
i don't know but we're already headed for fascism under republican rule
2007-12-31 12:43:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by tyler "god of typos" 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
You prefer the fascist state the GOP desires?
Hillary is probably more of a true conservative than any current Repub politician. If you are old enough to remember Barry Goldwater then you'll know what I mean.
And, by the way, I am not a Hillary supporter. It is just annoying to keep seeing all of this 'socialist' label placed on her just as another 'fear' tactic by the GOP. I hope the American people have learned their lesson that 'fear and loathing' is all the GOP has to offer.
2007-12-31 12:42:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Hillary is too polarizing of a political figure.
She will never see the white house.... unless the next President invites her over for a tour!
2007-12-31 12:41:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋